Age of Innocence / innocence as knowing pretense not to know
example · film: The Age of Innocence ·
retold in 4 talks
In Wharton's story (and Scorsese's film) the wife (Winona Ryder) is perceived as naive about her husband's affair with Countess Olenska (Michelle Pfeiffer), but we learn she knew all along and pretended not to, Žižek calls this 'the innocence' and says this mode is disappearing today.
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026
As told 3
“She knew it all the time, she just pretended not to know. This is the innocence.”
“When he learns it, everything is ruined. That's I think our much more fundamental need than directly to believe. To have another one as protected innocence.”
“As we learn at the end, she knew it all the time. Before they were less naive.”
What it carries
one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)
Its cast and sources
populated by
Stephen Heath1Erica Jong1Albert Camus1Montesquieu1Karl Rove1Edith Wharton1Raymond Durgnat1Laura Mulvey1
alongside works
Every retelling 3
In Wharton's story (and Scorsese's film) the wife (Winona Ryder) is perceived as naive about her husband's affair with Countess Olenska (Michelle Pfeiffer), but we learn she knew all along and pretended not to, Žižek calls this 'the innocence' and says this mode is disappearing today., illustrating the symbolic function,objectified belief,decline of the symbolic function
In Edith Wharton's novel (rendered through the film cast: Daniel Day-Lewis, Winona Ryder, Michelle Pfeiffer), the most devastating revelation is not the affair itself but that the wife always knew and pretended not to, the destruction of the innocent Big Other proxy., illustrating belief without believing,the Big Other,inter-passivity
In Wharton's novel, the figure of innocence (Winona Ryder's character in Scorsese's film) turns out to have known everything all along; pre-modern society combined sincere belief with radical knowledge, while modernity separates them into naive credulity., illustrating belief and knowledge,pre-modern vs. modern subjectivity