žižek archive
archive / stories / Khrushchev Report: Fadeyev's suicide

Khrushchev Report: Fadeyev's suicide

anecdote · history: Soviet · retold in 3 talks

The Soviet Stalinist writer Aleksandr Fadeyev killed himself after Khrushchev's 1956 Congress report, but not because he learned anything new. The unbearable fact was not the revelation but its public staging. This shows how the surface matters more than underlying knowledge.

2002: 1 talk 2006: 1 talk 2010: 1 talk
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026

As told 3

“He didn't learn basically anything new in Khrushchev's report. What was disturbed was only the surface. It was rendered public. That was the unbearable fact.”
“What Khrushchev and his critics of Stalinism, his comrades, were returning to was again, it's exactly the same as that imagined Billy Bathgate. It was retroactively constructed.”
“they were just deprived of the historical legitimation of their crimes in the communist historical absolute”
11:02 God Without the Sacred2010-11-09 · 1:40:54

What it carries

one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)

Its cast and sources

populated by
alongside works

Every retelling 3

The Soviet Stalinist writer Aleksandr Fadeyev killed himself after Khrushchev's 1956 Congress report, but not because he learned anything new. The unbearable fact was not the revelation but its public staging. This shows how the surface matters more than underlying knowledge., illustrating fetishist disavowal,belief,ideology
Khrushchev's 'return to true Leninist origins' was a retroactive construction; the 'authentic' Lenin was an imaginary third term created by the failure of Stalinism, not a historical reality., illustrating Real as empty third place
11:02 God Without the Sacred2010-11-09 · 1:40:54
After Khrushchev denounced Stalin's crimes, many communist cadres who already knew the facts committed suicide, not because they learned anything new but because they were deprived of the historical-absolutist legitimation for their crimes., illustrating Stalinist ideology,the big Other as legitimating cover