The Knesset Debate
example · current events/Israel-Hamas war ·
retold in 3 talks
A Knesset supporter defends the torture, asking if inserting a stick into a rectum is legitimate, only to be shouted down, illustrating shamelessness.
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026
As told 3
“to insert a stick into a person's rectum is this legitimate”43:30 Slavoj Zizek's "THE PARALLAX OF LACK AND SURPLUS IN POLITICS" (LACK V, 2025)2025-03-15 · 1:28:55
“To insert a stick into a person's rectum, is this legitimate? ... Yes, if he is Nukhba, everything is legitimate to do, everything.”
“But sorry, when struggle—Israel struggle for Israeli self-defense becomes a publicly admitted horrible mode of torture, then it's over.”
What it carries
one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)
Its cast and sources
populated by
alongside works
Every retelling 3
43:30 Slavoj Zizek's "THE PARALLAX OF LACK AND SURPLUS IN POLITICS" (LACK V, 2025)2025-03-15 · 1:28:55
A Knesset supporter defends the torture, asking if inserting a stick into a rectum is legitimate, only to be shouted down, illustrating shamelessness., illustrating shamelessness,liberal fascism
An Israeli minister defends torture (rectal insertion of sticks) against a Palestinian MP, claiming it is legitimate for 'Nukhba' Hamas terrorists. Žižek presents this as the lowest point of shamelessness., illustrating shamelessness
1:00:02 Slavoj Žižek Interview and 2024 US Election Latest | W News, Riz Khan & Global News Today 30/10/242024-10-30 · 2:58:15
Žižek recounts a Knesset debate where the majority defended unspeakable torture of Palestinians as part of the struggle against terrorism, arguing that hypocrisy (shame) is preferable to this open ethical decay., illustrating ethics,ideology,geopolitics-war