'A.I. is Incredibly Stupid!' - Slavoj Žižek Fires Back at Audience Question
Talk · Daily Dose of Economics ·
2026-06-17 · 0:21:51 · 2,841 words
technology-ai-cyberspaceecology-climatecommunism-socialismfascism-populismideologyliberalism-political-correctnessgeopolitics-warsubjectivity
Žižek argues that human specificity lies in irrationality, ritual, and the ability to transform mistakes into positive outcomes, offering a counter to artificial intelligence. He critiques deep ecology as arrogant anthropocentrism and reinterprets the pandemic as the death of the capitalist myth, proposing 'war communism' as the necessary emergency response. Finally, he analyzes the current geopolitical landscape through Orwell, critiques the liberal left's failure, and distinguishes between the fear of dying and the acceptance of death.
every located moment in this recording, click one to read it
The ideas in it 9
in the order they first come up; click a row for what he does with the idea here
as “small daily rituals”
Spontaneous, meaningless behaviors (like avoiding dark lines on the floor) that produce the effect of meaning, which AI cannot replicate.
as “cursing as language at its zero point”
Cursing represents the moment of being in language but not totally at home in it, a frustration that AI cannot spontaneously generate.
The human capacity to make irrational, unexpected moves that confuse surveillance technology and AI, which relies on rational grounding.
The specifically human ability to transform failure or error (like rotten cheese) into something new and valuable, unlike AI which only learns from mistakes.
The critique of relying on nature as a stable, benevolent background, noting that Earth's history is full of catastrophes unrelated to humanity.
as “deep ecology as arrogance”
The paradoxical claim that positioning humans as just one species among many is actually the most arrogant position because it grants us the unique universal role of caretakers.
The old political framework that the left must abandon to address the reality of the 'dead' capitalist order.
An emergency state of communism necessitated by global crises, where the state takes control of the economy to survive, distinct from the welfare state.
The distinction between the biological process of dying (which he fears) and the event of death (which he might welcome if instant).
Stories he reaches for 3
Richard Bernstein recounts how Hannah Arendt died: she fell asleep during a debate, woke up, debated, and died. Žižek uses this to illustrate his view on accepting death if it is instant.
“she invited guests she was sitting people were debating philosophy she said I will just fall asleep a little bit”
Žižek jokes that there is no good Mother Earth because mega-catastrophes (ice ages, etc.) happened before humanity, creating the resources (coal, oil) we rely on.
“there is no good Mother Earth... how many mega catastrophes happened on our earth before even humanity was here”
A French friend explains that French cuisine (cheese, champagne) is the result of laziness and mistakes (rotten cheese, incorrect wine processing), illustrating how humans turn failure into positive forms.
“it can all be explained by laziness and stupidity... you get French cheese”
Works invoked 2
V for Vendetta film
Mentioned in the context of the current political situation in Serbia (dictatorship).
1984 book
Žižek dislikes Orwell's vision but uses the three-mega-power structure (Oceania, Eurasia, East Asia) to analyze current US/Russia/China/Europe geopolitics.
People invoked 6
Schmidt/Schultz positive
A CEO whose idea of using AI to solve ecology is liked by Žižek as a 'radical pessimist view'.
Richard Bernstein positive
Cited as the source of the anecdote about Hannah Arendt's death.
Donald Trump negative
Described as the result of the crisis of the liberal democratic state, not an anomaly.
Žižek explicitly states he does not like Orwell's vision of the future, though he finds value in his geopolitical mapping.
Hannah Arendt positive
Used as an example of a dignified, philosophical death; Žižek admires her composure.
Vladimir Putin negative
Grouped with Trump as speaking the same language of old-fashioned imperial expansion.
Transcript 21 turns
Slavoj Žižek
I am not a pessimist I am not saying artificial intelligence will destroy us or whatever maybe it will even produce or give birth to a new form of spirituality but which will be totally different from our form of spirituality our form of spirituality human is very specific here that's why I'm not afraid of the machines to give you again an example that I often quote you know computers can be infinitely more strategic thinking self-learning and so on but as far as I know they can't do two things first they cannot develop you can program it but spontaneously I don't think they can develop small daily rituals you know we all have them like if I step here I don't know what you call that it should be at least three lines or not step on dark you know these small rituals they don't have any deep meaning but they produce the effect of meaning as such the opposite thing and this I mean extremely seriously as far as I know except if you program it artificial intelligence cannot swear curse cursing is for me language at its zero point cursing means not just I am frustrated but I'm frustrated because I cannot find a proper word cursing means yes I am in language but not totally at home in language
I am not a pessimist I am not saying artificial intelligence will destroy us or whatever maybe it will even produce or give birth to a new form of spirituality but which will be totally different from our form of spirituality our form of spirituality human is very specific here that's why I'm not afraid of the machines to give you again an example that I often quote you know computers can be infinitely more strategic thinking self-learning and so on but as far as I know they can't do two things first they cannot develop you can program it but spontaneously I don't think they can develop small daily rituals you know we all have them like if I step here I don't know what you call that it should be at least three lines or not step on dark you know these small rituals they don't have any deep meaning but they produce the effect of meaning as such the opposite thing and this I mean extremely seriously as far as I know except if you program it artificial intelligence cannot swear curse cursing is for me language at its zero point cursing means not just I am frustrated but I'm frustrated because I cannot find a proper word cursing means yes I am in language but not totally at home in language
unknown
let's talk about technology just about technology because whose interest does it serve because our opposition isn't to technological development but whose interest I mean one of the things that worries me is surveillance technology which is being developed by the likes of China Russia Israel and some suggest that could just make dissent impossible I mean you were talking about organizing protesting before and the limits there in but you can see quite easily how AI surveillance technology and so on could create quite a dystopian universe to live in
let's talk about technology just about technology because whose interest does it serve because our opposition isn't to technological development but whose interest I mean one of the things that worries me is surveillance technology which is being developed by the likes of China Russia Israel and some suggest that could just make dissent impossible I mean you were talking about organizing protesting before and the limits there in but you can see quite easily how AI surveillance technology and so on could create quite a dystopian universe to live in
Slavoj Žižek
yeah but I think our chance is that the surveillance technology can be surprised by our stupidity we cannot beat it but I am afraid that precisely not afraid precisely because it takes everything into account and so on this surveillance machines can be confused by us doing something that simply cannot be grounded in a rational reason for example I spoke with a friend who is very deeply in a poker but poker played by artificial intelligence and so on and he said or even chess now we know that computers can artificial intelligence can beat every chess player but you know what gives you a hope if you do some irrational unexpected moves the artificial intelligence gets confused doesn't know how to react and so on and
yeah but I think our chance is that the surveillance technology can be surprised by our stupidity we cannot beat it but I am afraid that precisely not afraid precisely because it takes everything into account and so on this surveillance machines can be confused by us doing something that simply cannot be grounded in a rational reason for example I spoke with a friend who is very deeply in a poker but poker played by artificial intelligence and so on and he said or even chess now we know that computers can artificial intelligence can beat every chess player but you know what gives you a hope if you do some irrational unexpected moves the artificial intelligence gets confused doesn't know how to react and so on and
unknown
that's the ultimate blind spot of the ruling class they think they can automate control they buy up advanced algorithms and surveillance tech to keep the working class quiet they want us predictable they want us obedient but human beings aren't lines of code we are messy we make mistakes and those exact mistakes are what terrifies the corporate establishment because you can't program a rebellion you can't predict a wildcat strike with a computer model think about it the bosses want every second of your workday optimized by a machine they track your clicks they time your bathroom breaks yet the moment workers do something completely unexpected the entire corporate machine grinds to a halt it freezes so our power isn't in playing their rigged game perfectly our power is in disrupting it entirely but how far will the elites go to force their algorithmic control on us let's see how Zizek flips this corporate nightmare into a
that's the ultimate blind spot of the ruling class they think they can automate control they buy up advanced algorithms and surveillance tech to keep the working class quiet they want us predictable they want us obedient but human beings aren't lines of code we are messy we make mistakes and those exact mistakes are what terrifies the corporate establishment because you can't program a rebellion you can't predict a wildcat strike with a computer model think about it the bosses want every second of your workday optimized by a machine they track your clicks they time your bathroom breaks yet the moment workers do something completely unexpected the entire corporate machine grinds to a halt it freezes so our power isn't in playing their rigged game perfectly our power is in disrupting it entirely but how far will the elites go to force their algorithmic control on us let's see how Zizek flips this corporate nightmare into a
unknown
strange kind of hope and I think that the great thing about being
strange kind of hope and I think that the great thing about being
Slavoj Žižek
human still is to make the right type of mistake not what not what artificial intelligence can do I know they can learn from mistakes and so on I'm not talking about learning from mistakes but to turn around what appears a mistake into a new positive form my eternal example I spoke with a French friend who and this is very rare for French people is very critical of France and he told me the great French cuisine but it can all be explained by laziness and stupidity like a guy was making cheese he was too lazy the cheese got rotten oh you get French cheese you know it smells bad or I don't know you have wine you don't do it correctly wine whatever processes you get champagne and so on so this idea of turning a failure a mistake as such into something new this I think is even I'm now even writing a book on it on this I think is what is specifically human so it's possible that's the first thing the second thing and here I would like to ask you since you are you explain it to me you are just voted out of despair the best of the bad choices the Green Party but you know whom I with whom I sympathize a CEO called some strange Schulz or whatever Schmidt I don't know name had this idea it's clear that we are too late for to prevent this rising temperatures and so on the problem if you want to have supercomputers is that they spend a lot of energy so we cannot have green politics and mega computers but he said ecology is lost temperature will raise so we should put all our resources into artificial intelligence which will not only it will control our lives but it may even then in a way unknown to us it may even produce solutions for ecology that we even cannot imagine today I like this radical pessimist view because you know what I am tired of this ecology which appears to be anti-anthropocentric but remains totally anthropocentric for example it's my old joke sorry if I repeat it there is no good Mother Earth are you aware how many mega catastrophes happened on our earth before even humanity was here that's how we got coal oil and so on so we cannot rely on nature as that stable background and so on second thing when we talk about how we should realize that we are just one of among the species on the earth I find this basically a very arrogant position because while apparently humiliating us you are just one of the species it nonetheless gives us the unique universal position of taking care also for other species and so on and I we should at least be aware that there is deep ecology is at this level the most arrogant position that I can imagine yeah notice how the billionaire class loves to lecture us about saving the planet they fly around in private jets while telling working people to eat less meat and pay higher carbon taxes it's sickening it's hypocritical Zizek calls out this corporate environmentalism for exactly what it is pure arrogance the elite treat nature like a fragile museum piece that they own and manage they want to preserve their pristine playgrounds while the rest
human still is to make the right type of mistake not what not what artificial intelligence can do I know they can learn from mistakes and so on I'm not talking about learning from mistakes but to turn around what appears a mistake into a new positive form my eternal example I spoke with a French friend who and this is very rare for French people is very critical of France and he told me the great French cuisine but it can all be explained by laziness and stupidity like a guy was making cheese he was too lazy the cheese got rotten oh you get French cheese you know it smells bad or I don't know you have wine you don't do it correctly wine whatever processes you get champagne and so on so this idea of turning a failure a mistake as such into something new this I think is even I'm now even writing a book on it on this I think is what is specifically human so it's possible that's the first thing the second thing and here I would like to ask you since you are you explain it to me you are just voted out of despair the best of the bad choices the Green Party but you know whom I with whom I sympathize a CEO called some strange Schulz or whatever Schmidt I don't know name had this idea it's clear that we are too late for to prevent this rising temperatures and so on the problem if you want to have supercomputers is that they spend a lot of energy so we cannot have green politics and mega computers but he said ecology is lost temperature will raise so we should put all our resources into artificial intelligence which will not only it will control our lives but it may even then in a way unknown to us it may even produce solutions for ecology that we even cannot imagine today I like this radical pessimist view because you know what I am tired of this ecology which appears to be anti-anthropocentric but remains totally anthropocentric for example it's my old joke sorry if I repeat it there is no good Mother Earth are you aware how many mega catastrophes happened on our earth before even humanity was here that's how we got coal oil and so on so we cannot rely on nature as that stable background and so on second thing when we talk about how we should realize that we are just one of among the species on the earth I find this basically a very arrogant position because while apparently humiliating us you are just one of the species it nonetheless gives us the unique universal position of taking care also for other species and so on and I we should at least be aware that there is deep ecology is at this level the most arrogant position that I can imagine yeah notice how the billionaire class loves to lecture us about saving the planet they fly around in private jets while telling working people to eat less meat and pay higher carbon taxes it's sickening it's hypocritical Zizek calls out this corporate environmentalism for exactly what it is pure arrogance the elite treat nature like a fragile museum piece that they own and manage they want to preserve their pristine playgrounds while the rest
unknown
of us drown in economic hardship but real nature isn't some peaceful mother figure it's wild and unpredictable and by framing climate change as a personal moral failure of the poor corporations completely dodge the blame for polluting the earth for profit why should a factory worker feel guilty while oil executives get multimillion-dollar bonuses now look at where this elite arrogance takes us they want to use tech to manage the climate crisis without ever giving up their wealth but can they really outsmart a dying planet let's find out
of us drown in economic hardship but real nature isn't some peaceful mother figure it's wild and unpredictable and by framing climate change as a personal moral failure of the poor corporations completely dodge the blame for polluting the earth for profit why should a factory worker feel guilty while oil executives get multimillion-dollar bonuses now look at where this elite arrogance takes us they want to use tech to manage the climate crisis without ever giving up their wealth but can they really outsmart a dying planet let's find out
Slavoj Žižek
we pretend to care for you know in deep ecology you even have the idea that not only animals and plants but even some valleys rivers mountains have their own value and so on no only for us they have it look at mountains do you know that till Romanticism mountains were considered horror like till late 18th century Alps were just a place where you quickly went through to reach Italy it's Romantics who invented Alps and Switzerland and so on so my point is that the truly radical position is we cannot rely on nature as our mother some basic foundation and so on the situation is radically open everything is radically contingent we cannot rely on nature
we pretend to care for you know in deep ecology you even have the idea that not only animals and plants but even some valleys rivers mountains have their own value and so on no only for us they have it look at mountains do you know that till Romanticism mountains were considered horror like till late 18th century Alps were just a place where you quickly went through to reach Italy it's Romantics who invented Alps and Switzerland and so on so my point is that the truly radical position is we cannot rely on nature as our mother some basic foundation and so on the situation is radically open everything is radically contingent we cannot rely on nature
unknown
let's take some questions from the audience we're going to start with Ollie S he says has the left lost its identity beyond being the antithesis of the populist right I mean I would say that's more critique of the likes of Kamala Harris for example and that kind of liberalism but Ollie thinks maybe the left its identity is the antithesis is just you know being anti-Faragism anti-Trump no the first thing I would like to say here is that the Left should first analyze capitalism in a much more radical way in the sense that as I like to say referring to Freud I often repeat this formula that Trump is the last liberal fetish why because all those liberal leftists who criticize Trump they focus on Trump to
let's take some questions from the audience we're going to start with Ollie S he says has the left lost its identity beyond being the antithesis of the populist right I mean I would say that's more critique of the likes of Kamala Harris for example and that kind of liberalism but Ollie thinks maybe the left its identity is the antithesis is just you know being anti-Faragism anti-Trump no the first thing I would like to say here is that the Left should first analyze capitalism in a much more radical way in the sense that as I like to say referring to Freud I often repeat this formula that Trump is the last liberal fetish why because all those liberal leftists who criticize Trump they focus on Trump to
Slavoj Žižek
avoid the key question Trump didn't fall from the moon Trump is the result of the crisis of the liberal democratic state so the only way to get rid of Trump is I know this sounds Stalinist a self-criticism why can this can I'm not saying it will give some hope because the moment the left will realize this it will have to get rid of this temptation to play the old liberal democratic welfare state game I think that if some kind of communism will come and I think it will it will be now I will really provoke you a war communism because no I don't believe in you know oh new welfare and so on there will be that's absolutely clear such emergency states that and we get sorry we got the first taste of this states with that's why I loved COVID epidemic now let that sink in for a second the old capitalist order is dead and buried the elites know it even if they won't admit it on the evening news we saw how fast free market rules got thrown out the window during the pandemic the government literally handed out thousands of dollars because the system couldn't survive a single month without a bailout it proved that capitalism is a complete myth it only works when it's sucking the blood out of the working class but when a real global crisis hits the state has to step in and distribute resources just to keep society from collapsing Zizek calls this war communism it's an emergency reality and the big question isn't whether the state will take control of the economy the real question is who benefits from that control will it be a corporate fascist nightmare designed to protect billionaire profits or will it be a system run by and for the common man the stakes couldn't be any higher watch closely because the future of human civilization is being decided right now will it be what a Trumpian fascism which is now getting universalized for example I mention this all the time I know but nonetheless I don't like Orwell his vision of is wrong I think but there is one wonderful thing in it you know what's the situation in you have three mega powers Oceania Eurasia and East Asia this is where we are today United States Russia and China and Europe is in between divided not clear where so that's why I think that's why I'm against Brexit we should never forget that Trump and Putin even when they are not even when they don't agree they basically speak the same language I think this Orwellian language of like Putin says open set openly remember Greenland okay you take it but Ukraine is ours and so on it's very old-fashioned what we say but I'm less and less anti-Eurocentric because European legacy of
avoid the key question Trump didn't fall from the moon Trump is the result of the crisis of the liberal democratic state so the only way to get rid of Trump is I know this sounds Stalinist a self-criticism why can this can I'm not saying it will give some hope because the moment the left will realize this it will have to get rid of this temptation to play the old liberal democratic welfare state game I think that if some kind of communism will come and I think it will it will be now I will really provoke you a war communism because no I don't believe in you know oh new welfare and so on there will be that's absolutely clear such emergency states that and we get sorry we got the first taste of this states with that's why I loved COVID epidemic now let that sink in for a second the old capitalist order is dead and buried the elites know it even if they won't admit it on the evening news we saw how fast free market rules got thrown out the window during the pandemic the government literally handed out thousands of dollars because the system couldn't survive a single month without a bailout it proved that capitalism is a complete myth it only works when it's sucking the blood out of the working class but when a real global crisis hits the state has to step in and distribute resources just to keep society from collapsing Zizek calls this war communism it's an emergency reality and the big question isn't whether the state will take control of the economy the real question is who benefits from that control will it be a corporate fascist nightmare designed to protect billionaire profits or will it be a system run by and for the common man the stakes couldn't be any higher watch closely because the future of human civilization is being decided right now will it be what a Trumpian fascism which is now getting universalized for example I mention this all the time I know but nonetheless I don't like Orwell his vision of is wrong I think but there is one wonderful thing in it you know what's the situation in you have three mega powers Oceania Eurasia and East Asia this is where we are today United States Russia and China and Europe is in between divided not clear where so that's why I think that's why I'm against Brexit we should never forget that Trump and Putin even when they are not even when they don't agree they basically speak the same language I think this Orwellian language of like Putin says open set openly remember Greenland okay you take it but Ukraine is ours and so on it's very old-fashioned what we say but I'm less and less anti-Eurocentric because European legacy of
unknown
enlightenment don't forget that all the talk about women's rights and so on comes from the legacy of enlightenment which always had this tremendous potential for self-criticism sorry if this sounds Stalinist but what I want to say is that I'm not dreaming communism I'm talking about chaotic situations of real crisis where communism just in the sense of global coordination will have to be invented the point is only will it be done in the rightist fascist way or we can do it I'm interested in this one as you're a former Yugoslav citizen and it also touches on well I'll say it's anonymous what do you think will happen in regards to the student protests in Serbia I was in Belgrade last year I'm interested in this because you talk about the emergence of communism in some form in the future and it strikes me that you know in Eastern Europe they had experience of the various Stalinist forms obviously
enlightenment don't forget that all the talk about women's rights and so on comes from the legacy of enlightenment which always had this tremendous potential for self-criticism sorry if this sounds Stalinist but what I want to say is that I'm not dreaming communism I'm talking about chaotic situations of real crisis where communism just in the sense of global coordination will have to be invented the point is only will it be done in the rightist fascist way or we can do it I'm interested in this one as you're a former Yugoslav citizen and it also touches on well I'll say it's anonymous what do you think will happen in regards to the student protests in Serbia I was in Belgrade last year I'm interested in this because you talk about the emergence of communism in some form in the future and it strikes me that you know in Eastern Europe they had experience of the various Stalinist forms obviously
Slavoj Žižek
and that's trashed the left as a mass force there is there any you know could you see a left because the left isn't there it doesn't have the leadership of those sorts of protests it's normally kind of Western liberal facing so what do you think about those student protests and could you see the re-emergence of a left in Eastern Europe I have some doubts because what fascinated me I've written about it as you know in Serbian protests is that they were in some ironic sense law and order protests there were no this chaotic stuff break the windows and so on you know what was for me unique when the protesters occupied a bridge in Novi Sad in Vojvodina north of Belgrade for hours then at the end they said sorry the bridge will be closed for another three hours because we want to clean all the shit the traces of or there is a wonderful photo which is for me almost photo of the year where two ladies are on a step on a on a wooden wooden chair there in a park supporting the protests but they put their shoes off not to put the dirt on the on the wooden chair and so on this sense of order the problem now is of course what to do now there is I don't know if this already happened when you were there but the last news I got is that it's precisely V for Vendetta
and that's trashed the left as a mass force there is there any you know could you see a left because the left isn't there it doesn't have the leadership of those sorts of protests it's normally kind of Western liberal facing so what do you think about those student protests and could you see the re-emergence of a left in Eastern Europe I have some doubts because what fascinated me I've written about it as you know in Serbian protests is that they were in some ironic sense law and order protests there were no this chaotic stuff break the windows and so on you know what was for me unique when the protesters occupied a bridge in Novi Sad in Vojvodina north of Belgrade for hours then at the end they said sorry the bridge will be closed for another three hours because we want to clean all the shit the traces of or there is a wonderful photo which is for me almost photo of the year where two ladies are on a step on a on a wooden wooden chair there in a park supporting the protests but they put their shoes off not to put the dirt on the on the wooden chair and so on this sense of order the problem now is of course what to do now there is I don't know if this already happened when you were there but the last news I got is that it's precisely V for Vendetta
unknown
part no there is a tendency which is I think pseudo-radical which claims no compromise protest shouldn't stop which is just go on on dreaming about some pure communism and so on I think this can only end up in new
part no there is a tendency which is I think pseudo-radical which claims no compromise protest shouldn't stop which is just go on on dreaming about some pure communism and so on I think this can only end up in new
Slavoj Žižek
dictatorship but that's the ultimate danger of
dictatorship but that's the ultimate danger of
unknown
pure unadulterated idealism when people demand total perfection from a movement they paralyze it they crush it the corporate elite love it when the left fights over ideological purity it means we aren't fighting them they sit in their luxury boardrooms and laugh while working-class movements splinter into a million pieces it's tragic real change is chaotic and messy it requires making hard compromise choices in the real world if you just sit back
pure unadulterated idealism when people demand total perfection from a movement they paralyze it they crush it the corporate elite love it when the left fights over ideological purity it means we aren't fighting them they sit in their luxury boardrooms and laugh while working-class movements splinter into a million pieces it's tragic real change is chaotic and messy it requires making hard compromise choices in the real world if you just sit back
Slavoj Žižek
and dream of a flawless utopia you hand victory right back to the billionaires they want you passive they want you cynical so we have to deal with the world as it actually is not how we wish it would be and that brings us to the ultimate question of existence how do we face the end of our own lives when the world around us is in absolute turmoil Zizek shifts to something deeply personal here and his raw honesty might just shock you this is a jarring jump but I like it Andrew why do some people fear death ah here I will give you a simple answer which is very personal I don't fear death I feel I fear dying I would even welcome death if it will you know who died ideally a guy who was there Richard Bernstein told me he was visiting Hannah Arendt when she died you know she invited guests she was sitting people were debating philosophy she said I will just fall asleep a little bit she was sleeping for minutes she re-awakened debated again
and dream of a flawless utopia you hand victory right back to the billionaires they want you passive they want you cynical so we have to deal with the world as it actually is not how we wish it would be and that brings us to the ultimate question of existence how do we face the end of our own lives when the world around us is in absolute turmoil Zizek shifts to something deeply personal here and his raw honesty might just shock you this is a jarring jump but I like it Andrew why do some people fear death ah here I will give you a simple answer which is very personal I don't fear death I feel I fear dying I would even welcome death if it will you know who died ideally a guy who was there Richard Bernstein told me he was visiting Hannah Arendt when she died you know she invited guests she was sitting people were debating philosophy she said I will just fall asleep a little bit she was sleeping for minutes she re-awakened debated again
unknown
fell asleep again re-awakened fell asleep and didn't re-awaken can you
fell asleep again re-awakened fell asleep and didn't re-awaken can you
unknown
imagine a more happy death what I am afraid is for example even I will be very brutal here I'm very attached to my family my two sons and if my one of my sons were to if I were to be informed he was
imagine a more happy death what I am afraid is for example even I will be very brutal here I'm very attached to my family my two sons and if my one of my sons were to if I were to be informed he was
unknown
killed
killed
Slavoj Žižek
he died my instant question would have been and I'm not kidding here was it instant or did he suffer if it I were to be informed it was instant I would say nice tell me later I go on writing my text if he suffered I doubt if I would survive
he died my instant question would have been and I'm not kidding here was it instant or did he suffer if it I were to be informed it was instant I would say nice tell me later I go on writing my text if he suffered I doubt if I would survive
unknown
wow
wow