Eisenstein vs. Tarkovsky as two torturers
example · cinema: Eisenstein, Tarkovsky ·
retold in 4 talks
Žižek compares film directors Eisenstein (cutting/montage) and Tarkovsky (slow stretching) to two torturers asking 'what's the better way to squeeze out the truth?' illustrating that all art is a mode of 'torturing' language.
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026
As told 4
“imagine a debate between eisenstein and tarkovsky. it's like two torturers. what's the better way to squeeze out the truth?”
“Eisenstein saying 'I cut him to pieces,' 'no no,' said Tarkovsky, 'it's better to stretch him a little bit.'”
“Let me imagine Eisenstein and Tarkovsky debating as two torturers. One says cut and squeeze the testicles. The other says no, just stretch them.”
What it carries
one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)
Its cast and sources
populated by
Hassan Ngeze2Elfriede Jelinek4Aleksandar Tijanić2François Balmès2Carlos Westendorp1Petar II Petrović-Njegoš1Néstor Kirchner1Wilhelm Reich2
alongside works
Every retelling 4
Žižek compares film directors Eisenstein (cutting/montage) and Tarkovsky (slow stretching) to two torturers asking 'what's the better way to squeeze out the truth?' illustrating that all art is a mode of 'torturing' language., illustrating language as torture house
Žižek reframes the classic cinema debate: Eisenstein cuts and fragments (torture by cutting), Tarkovsky stretches with long takes (torture by the rack), both are torturers of filmic material, not opposites of violence and peace., illustrating sprachzerstörende Gewalt (language-destroying violence),language as inherently violent and stupid
Eisenstein cuts and combines (sadistic torture); Tarkovsky stretches scenes into quarter-hour sequences (the rack). Both practice violence on cinema, not passive letting-be. Žižek imagines them debating like a Latin American communist torturer vs. a KGB torturer., illustrating divine violence of language,language as torture,cinema as violence
Eisenstein cuts and synthetically assembles images (active torture); Tarkovsky stretches them through duration (the seven-minute shot of a tree in Sacrifice, the rack). Both are torture machines of cinema, not opposites., illustrating language as torture machine,cinema and truth