žižek archive
archive / stories / Gianni Vattimo’s Defense of Heidegger

Gianni Vattimo’s Defense of Heidegger

anecdote · Heidegger, 'Why Stay in the Provinces?' · retold in 5 talks

Žižek describes leftist philosopher Gianni Vattimo’s attempt to save Heidegger by arguing he was just a 'stupid local guy' making a concrete mistake, ignoring that Heidegger’s philosophy itself warns against confusing metaphysical stance with concrete people.

2008: 1 talk 2017: 1 talk 2018: 1 talk 2021: 1 talk 2023: 1 talk
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026

As told 5

“Heidegger was also a stupid local guy from that area... Because his entire philosophy is about the difference between ontological... and ontic level...”
“he thoughtfully put his faithful hand on my shoulder. Ever so slightly he shook his head. That meant absolutely no.”
“I was told that Martin Heidegger once took a walk on your famous Philosophenweg, slipped on a sharp turn and ingloriously fell down”

What it carries

one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)

Its cast and sources

populated by
alongside works

Every retelling 5

Žižek describes leftist philosopher Gianni Vattimo’s attempt to save Heidegger by arguing he was just a 'stupid local guy' making a concrete mistake, ignoring that Heidegger’s philosophy itself warns against confusing metaphysical stance with concrete people., illustrating ontological difference,ideology
Heidegger recounts withdrawing to his hut and asking a 75-year-old farmer whether to accept a Berlin chair; the farmer silently shakes his head, 'absolutely no.' Žižek reads it as the false mystique of ordinary people's wisdom (and suspects the farmer just told Heidegger what he wanted to hear)., illustrating false elevation of ordinary people is a fake,we cannot trust the people
Žižek opens with an anecdote that Heidegger once slipped and fell on Heidelberg's famous Philosophers' Walk; he uses this to frame his own intervention as a comment on another, more consequential slip of Heidegger as a thinker., illustrating Heidegger's philosophical errors,man as catastrophe
Žižek outlines three ways scholars excuse Heidegger's Nazism: 1) Contingent personal failure; 2) A sign his thought was not radical enough, leading to a 'better' later philosophy; 3) (Ernst Nolte) He was right, as Nazism was a justified reaction to economic crisis/Bolshevik terror., illustrating constitutive other scene
13:56 On Violence2008-09-15 · 1:11:30
Heidegger's preaching of passive Gelassenheit is contradicted by his own practice: his reading of Parmenides is one of the most violent torturings of a text, twisting syntax, rewriting propositions, showing that genuine thought always tortures language., illustrating divine violence of language,language as torture,Heidegger's self-contradiction