žižek archive
archive / stories / Hannah Arendt and Eichmann

Hannah Arendt and Eichmann

anecdote · book: Eichmann in Jerusalem · retold in 4 talks

Žižek argues Arendt’s 'banality of evil' is a correct theory based on a wrong example, as Eichmann was actually a fanatic, not a mere bureaucrat.

2000: 1 talk 2018: 1 talk 2021: 1 talk 2025: 1 talk
≤2000talks it is told in, per year2026

As told 4

“Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem. It's a beautiful theory, the banality of evil... just it's not true for Eichmann.”
“what horrible things I had to watch in the pursuance of my duties, how heavily the task weighed upon my shoulders.”
“when somebody in the debate stood up and said, 'But what you just said reminds me of Hannah Arendt,' it means you are finished.”

What it carries

one story, many jobs: the ideas this anecdote is deployed to argue, one tally mark per use (an idea page shows the same relation from the other end, as its shelf of stories)

Its cast and sources

populated by
alongside works

Every retelling 4

Žižek argues Arendt’s 'banality of evil' is a correct theory based on a wrong example, as Eichmann was actually a fanatic, not a mere bureaucrat., illustrating myth of direct transparency
Nazi executioners justified their acts by framing them as a 'heavy burden' of duty, resisting the 'temptation' of pity, thus turning their violation of ethical instincts into proof of their ethical grandeur., illustrating moral twist / distortion,ethical temptation
Twenty-five years ago, having your argument compared to Hannah Arendt was a conversation-ender; today she is almost untouchable even for those (like Kristeva or Bernstein) who should theoretically oppose her., illustrating unwritten rules,academia,big Other
Using Arendt’s analysis, Žižek contrasts the 'human' obscenity and empirical evil of the SA (street fighters) with the 'inhuman' cold executioner style of the SS, arguing the latter (Vance) is more terrifying., illustrating fascism-populism,ideology