The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology (2012)
This is the voiceover script of Sophie Fiennes's 2012 documentary film 'The Pervert's Guide to Ideology,' in which Žižek delivers a sustained analysis of ideological mechanisms through close readings of Hollywood and Soviet cinema. Moving from John Carpenter's 'They Live' and 'The Sound of Music' through Beethoven's Ninth, Jaws, Taxi Driver, Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket, The Dark Knight, Terry Gilliam's Brazil, and Scorsese's Last Temptation of Christ, he argues that ideology is not a distorting lens we can simply remove but the very medium of our spontaneous social reality, operating through enjoyment rather than mere belief. The talk concludes with a call for authentic emancipatory politics that involves changing not just reality but the very dreams through which we apprehend it, drawing on Walter Benjamin's idea of redeeming past failed revolutions.
The ideas in it 27
in the order they first come up; click a row for what he does with the idea here
Stories he reaches for 14
Works invoked 26
People invoked 33
What it argues
Dialectical moves 15
Claims 38
Quotes 24
“I already am eating from the trash can all the time. The name of this trash can is ideology.”Slavoj Žižek · ideology as the medium of reality
“When we think that we escape ideology into our dreams, at that point we are within ideology.”Slavoj Žižek · ideology and the unconscious
“Ideology is not simply imposed on ourselves. Ideology is our spontaneous relationship to our social world, how we perceive its meaning and so on.”Slavoj Žižek · the nature of ideology
“You must be forced to be free. If you trust simply your spontaneous sense of well-being or whatever, you will never get free. Freedom hurts.”Slavoj Žižek · the violence of liberation
“The true hidden message: pretend to renounce and you can get it all.”Slavoj Žižek · the obscene supplement of official ideology
“Ideology always has to also work as an empty container open to all possible meanings.”Slavoj Žižek · ideological emptiness
“Whenever an ideological text says all humanity unite in brotherhood, joy, and so on, you should always ask: are these all really all, or is someone excluded?”Slavoj Žižek · the excluded remainder of universal fraternity
“If classical ideology functions in the mode of 'they don't know what they're doing but they're doing it,' cynical ideology functions in the mode of 'I know very well what I'm doing, but I'm still doing it.'”Slavoj Žižek · classical versus cynical ideology
“It's the price for the countermeasure for fighting consumerism is already included into the price of a commodity—the ultimate form of consumerism.”Slavoj Žižek · cultural capitalism / Starbucks ideology
“Capitalism has a strange religious structure. It is propelled by this absolute demand. Capital has to circulate, to reproduce itself, to expand, to multiply itself, and for this goal anything can be sacrificed.”Slavoj Žižek · capitalism as religion
“Capitalism is all the time in crisis. This is precisely why it appears almost indestructible. Crisis is not its obstacle, it is what pushes it forwards.”Slavoj Žižek · capitalism and crisis
“Every effective political ideological symbol or symptom has to rely on this dimension of petrified enjoyment, of the frozen grimace of an excessive pleasure in pain.”Slavoj Žižek · petrified enjoyment and ideology
“The truly disturbing thing about The Dark Knight is that it elevates lie into a general social principle—as if our societies can remain stable, can function only if based on a lie.”Slavoj Žižek · The Dark Knight and the noble lie
“If there is God, everything is permitted—to those who perceive themselves as direct instruments of the divine will.”Slavoj Žižek · religion and moral license
“There is no big Other. There may be a virtual big Other to whom you cannot confess; there may be a real other, but it's never the virtual one.”Slavoj Žižek · Lacan's claim: the big Other does not exist
“For a modern, secular, non-religious man, bureaucracy, state bureaucracy, is the only remaining contact with the dimension of the divine.”Slavoj Žižek · bureaucracy and the divine
“Hysteria is much more subversive than perversion. A pervert has no uncertainties, while the hysterical position is that of a doubt—which is an extremely productive position.”Slavoj Žižek · hysteria vs perversion
“The message of Christianity is radically atheist. The death of Christ is simply the disintegration of the God which guarantees the meaning of our lives.”Slavoj Žižek · Christianity as radical atheism
“The only way really to be an atheist is to go through Christianity. Christianity is much more atheist than the usual atheism.”Slavoj Žižek · Christianity and atheism
“We are responsible for our dreams. Our dreams stage our desires and our desires are not objective facts. We created them, we sustain them, we are responsible for them.”Slavoj Žižek · responsibility for desire and ideology
“The first step to freedom is not just to change reality to fit your dreams—it's to change the way you dream. And again, this hurts.”Slavoj Žižek · ideology and emancipation
“How come it is easier for us to imagine the end of all life on earth, an asteroid hitting the planet, than a modest change in our economic order?”Slavoj Žižek · ideological closure under capitalism
“Every revolution, if it is an authentic revolution, is not only directed towards the future, but it redeems also the past failed revolutions.”Slavoj Žižek · revolution and redemption
“You will never get rid of me. All the eyes in the world cannot kill a true idea.”Slavoj Žižek · persistence of emancipatory idea
Transcript 225 turns
I'm giving you a choice. either put on these glasses. I'll start eating that trash can.
I already am eating. from the trash can all the time. The name of this trash can is ideology. The material force of ideology makes me not see what I'm effectively eating. It's not only our reality which enslaves us. The tragedy. of our predicament when we are within ideology is that when we think that we escape it into our dreams at that point we are within ideology. They live from 19. 88. definitely one of the forgotten masterpieces of the Hollywood Left. It tells the story of John. Nada. Nada, of course, in Spanish means nothing. A pure subject, deprived of all substantial content. A homeless worker in LA who drifting around. One day enters into an abandoned church. and finds there a strange box full of sunglasses. And when he put One of them. On. Walking alone. the LA streets. He discovered something weird. The disc glasses function like critique of ideology Glasses. They allow you to see The real message beneath All the propaganda, publicity, glitz, posters, and so on. You see a large publicity board telling you have your holiday of a lifetime and when you put the glasses on you see just on the white background a gray inscription. We live so we are told. in a post-ideological society. We are interpolated That is to say, addressed by social authority. not as subjects. who should do their duty. sacrifice themselves. But… subjects of pleasures. realize your true potential. Be yourself. lead a satisfying life. When you put the glasses on. You see Dictatorship in Democracy is the invisible order which Sustains your apparent freedom. The explanation for the existence of this strange ideology, Glacies, is the standard story of the invasion of the body snatchers. Humanity is already under the control of Aliens.
Hey buddy. You're going to pay for that at what? Look, buddy. I don't want no hassle today. Either pay for it or put it back.
According to our Common sense. We think that ideology is something blurring, confusing our straight view. Ideology should be glasses which distort our view and The critique of ideology should be the opposite like you take off the glasses so that you can finally see the way things really are. This precisely and here the pessimism of the film of They Live is well justified. This precisely is the ultimate illusion. Ideology is not simply imposed on ourselves. Ideology is our spontaneous Relationship 2. our social world, how we perceive its meaning and so on and so on. We in a way enjoy our ideology. All right. to step out of ideology. It hurts. It's a painful experience. You must force yourself to do it. This is rendered in a wonderful way with a further scene in the film where John Nada tries to force his best friend John Armitage to also put the glasses on.
I don't want to fight you. Come on. I don't want to fight you. Stop it. No.
And it's the weirdest scene in the film. The fight takes eight, nine minutes. It may appear irrational, because why does this guy reject so violently to put the glasses on. It is as if he is well aware that spontaneously he lives in a lie, that the glasses will make him see the truth, but that this truth can be painful, can shatter many of your Illusions. This is a paradox we have to accept.
The glass is all. Fork him up!
the extreme violence of liberation. You must be forced to be free. If you trust simply your spontaneous sense of well-being or whatever, you will never get free. Look! Freedom. Hurt! The basic insight of psychoanalysis is to distinguish between enjoyment. And Simple. pleasures. They are not The same. enjoyment is Precisely enjoyment in disturbed pleasure. Even enjoyment in P and this excessive factor. disturbs the apparently simple relationship between Duty and pleasures. This is also a space where ideology. up to and especially religious ideology. operates. This brings me to maybe my favorite example. The great classical Hollywood film. The sound of music. We all know. It's the starting of A non. Who is Two. Alive with too much Energy ultimately, sexual energy to be constrained to the role of a nun.
Oh! Oh, reverend mother, I'm so sorry. I just couldn't help myself. The gates were open and the hills were beckoning and before I. I haven't summoned you here for apologies. Oh, please, mother, do let me ask for forgiveness. One, two, three, one, two, three, one, two, three, step together now.
So Mother Superior sends her to the Von Trepp family where she takes care of the children.
under. Good. to practice.
Do allow me, won't you? And At the same time, of course, falls in love with the Baron von Trapp. And Maria gets too disturbed by it. cannot control it. Returns to the Convent.
Oh, there were times when we would look at each other. Oh, mother, I could hardly breathe. Did you let him see how you felt? If I did, I didn't know it. That's what's been torturing me. I was there on God's errand.
No wonder that in old Communist Yugoslavia where I saw this film for the first time. Exactly. This scene, or more precisely the song which follows this strange hedonist, if you want, a. advised from the mother superior. Go back, seduce the guy, follow this path, do not betray your desire. namely The song which begins with "Climb every mountain." The song which is an almost embarrassing display and affirmation of desire. These three minutes Where? センサー
Every mountain Search high and low. Follow every byway. Every path you know.
I think the censor was a very intelligent man. He knew. as probably an atheist communist. where the power of attraction of Catholic religion Resides
Your dream. You know
If you read intelligent Catholic propagandists, and if you really try to discern what deal are they offering you, It's not to prohibit in this case sexual pleasures. It's a much more cynical contract, as it were, between the Church as an institution and The believer troubled with, in this case, sexual desires. It is this hidden, obscene permission that you get. You are covered by the divine big other. You can do whatever you want. Enjoy it. But we'll need This obscene contract does not belong to Christianity as such. It belongs to Catholic Church. as an institution. It is the logic of institution. at its purest. This is Again, a key to the functioning of the of ideology. not only the explicit message. renounce, suffer, and so on, but the true Hidden message. Pretend to renounce and you can get it all. My… Psychoanalytic friends are telling me that typically today patients who come. Pudhi. analysts to resolve their problems. Feel guilty, not because of excessive pleasures, not because they indulged in pleasures which go against their sense of duty or morality or whatsoever. On the contrary, they feel guilty for not enjoying enough, for not being able to enjoy. Oh my God, one is thirsty in the desert and What to drink? Go! The perfect commodity. Why? It was already Marx who long ago emphasized that a commodity is never just a simple object. that we buy and consume. A commodity isn't. Object. Full of theological, even metaphysical. NICE, LEE. Its presence always reflects an invisible transcendence. The classical publicity for Coke. quite openly refers to this absent, invisible quality. Coke is the real thing or Coke That's it. What is that it? The real thing. It's not just Another positive. Property of coke, something that can be described or. pinpointed through chemical analysis is that mysterious something more. Undescribable excess. which is the object. cause of my Desire. seis In our postmodern, however we call them societies. We are obliged to enjoy. Enjoyment becomes a kind of a weird, perverted Deut. Oh. Thank you. The paradox of coke is that You are thirsty, you drink it. As everyone knows, the more you drink it, the more thirsty you get. A desire. is never simply the desire for a certain thing, it's always also a desire for desire itself, a desire to continue to Desire, perhaps the ultimate horror of a desire. Isch. To be fully. filled in met so that I desire no longer. The ultimate melancholic experience is the experience of a Loss of desire itself. It's not that. in some return to an A previous era of natural a consumption where we got rid of this excess and were only consuming for actual needs like you were thirsty, you drank water and so on. We cannot return to that. The excess is with us forever. So Let's have a drink of coke. It's getting warm. It's no longer the real Coke and that's the problem. You know, this passage from. sublime to excremental dimension. When it's cold Properly served. It has a certain attraction. All of a sudden this can change into shit. It's the elementary dialectics of commodities. We are not talking about objective Factual properties of a commodity. We are talking only here about that elusive surplus. Kinder Surprise Egg a quite astonishing Commodity. The surprise of the Kinder, surprise, egg! is dead. this excessive object. the cause of your desire is here materialized in the guise of an object. a plastic toy which fills in the inner void of the chocolate egg. The whole delicate balance is between these two dimensions. What you bought the chocolate egg and The surplus probably made in some Chinese gulak or whatever, the surplus that you get for free. I don't think that The chocolate フレーム is here. Jaspo. send you on a deeper voyage towards The inner treasure, the What Plato calls the Agalma. which makes you a worthy person, which makes a commodity. The desirable commodity, I think, is the other way around. We should aim at The higher goal. The gold in the middle of an object precisely in order to be able to enjoy the surface. This is what is The anti-metaphysical lesson which is difficult to Accept. What does this Famous Oath to Joy, Stand for. It's usually perceived as a kind of a ode to humanity as such, to the brotherhood and freedom of all people. And what strikes the eye here is the universal adaptability of this well-known melody. It can be used by political movements which are totally opposed to each other. In Nazi Germany it was widely used to celebrate great public events. In Soviet Union Beethoven was lionized and the Ode to Joy was performed almost as a kind of a communist song. in China during the time of the Great Cultural Revolution. when almost all western music was prohibited. The ninth symphony was accepted. It was allowed to play it as a piece of progressive bourgeois music. at the extreme Hm Right. in South Rhodesia before it became Zimbabwe. proclaimed independence to be able to postpone the abolishment of apartheid. there for those couple of years of independent South Rhodesia. Again the melody of the Ode to Joy with changed lyrics, of course, was the anthem of the country.
La República Popular de la Democracia
At the opposite end. Abimael Guzmán, Presidente Gonzalo. The leader of Sendero Luminoso. The Shining Path. D. Extreme leftist guerrilla in Peru. When he was asked by a journalist which piece of music is his favorite he claimed again Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. Out to joy. when Germany's were still divided. and their team. was appearing together at Olympics. When one of the Germans won golden medal. The game "Ode to Joy" was played instead of either East or West German national anthem. And even now, today, Ode to Joy is the unofficial anthem of the European Union. So it's truly that. We can imagine a kind of a perverse scene of universal fraternity where Osama bin Laden is embracing President Bush, Saddam is embracing Fidel Castro, White Racist is embracing Mao Zedong, and all together they sing out to joy. It works. And This is how Every ideology has to work. It's never just meaning. It always has to also work as an empty container open to all possible meanings. It's you know that gut feeling that we feel When we experience something pathetic and we say, "Oh my God, I'm so moved, there is something so deep." But you never know what this depth is. It's a void. Now, of course, there is a catch here. The catch is that, of course, this neutrality of a frame is never as neutral as it appears. Here, I think. The perspective of Alex from the Clockwork Orange enters. We were all feeling
Feeling a bit shagged and fagged and fashed. it having been an evening of some small energy expenditure. Oh, my brothers So we got rid of the auto and stopped off at the Kirova for an
Nightcap. Why is Alex? This ultimate. Cynical. Delinquent. The hero of Clockwork Orange. Why is he so fascinated? Overwhelmed. When he sees the lady singing Beethoven's "Ode to Joy."
And it was like, for a moment, O my brothers, some great bird had flown into the milk pot. And I felt all the melanky little hairs on my plot. Standing endwise. and the shivers crawling up like slow melanki lizards. and then down again. because I knew what she said. It was a bit from the "Glorious Ninth" by Ludwig van. Ja, ja, ja, ja.
Whenever an ideological text says all humanity unite in brotherhood, joy, and so on, you should always ask, "Okay, okay, okay, but are these all, really all, or is someone excluded?" I think Alex, the delinquent from Clockwork Orange, identifies with this place of exclusion. And the great genius of Beethoven is that he literally staged this exclusion. All of a sudden the whole tone changes into a kind of a carnevale-esque rhythm. It's no longer this sublime beauty.
Excuse me, brother. I ordered this two weeks ago. Can you see if it's arrived yet, please?"
Just a minute.
We hear this vulgar music precisely when Alex enters a shopping arcade and we can see from his movements that now he feels at home. He's like fish in the water.
Pardon me, ladies.
Beethoven is not a cheap celebrator of the Brotherhood of Humanity and so on. We are one big happy family enjoying freedom, dignity and so on.
Enjoying that, are you, my darling?
The first part, which is falsely celebrated today, you hear it in all official events, is clearly identified with Beethoven as ideology. And then the second part tells the true story of that which disturbs the official ideology and of the failure of the official ideology to constrain it, to tame it. This is why Beethoven was doing something which may appear difficult to do. He was already in a purely musical work practicing critique of ideology. If the classical ideology function in the way designated by Marx. In his nice formula from Capital Volume 1, they don't know what they are doing, but they are nonetheless doing it. Cynical ideology functions in the mode of I know very well what I'm doing, but I'm still nonetheless doing it. This paradoxical constellation is staged in a beautiful way. in the famous song, "Officer Krupke," in Bernstein's and Sondheim's "West Side Story."
Hey you! Who me, Officer Krupki? Yeah, you! Give me one good reason for not dragging you down to the station house, you punk!" Dear, kindly Sergeant Krupke, you gotta understand, it's just our bringing up that gets us out of hand. Our mothers all are junkies, our fathers all are drunks. Golly Moses!
naturally
He was punks.
Gee, Officer Krupke, we're very upset. The delinquent gang inact A whole explanation is a musical number, of course, of why they are delinquents.
Good! There is good! There is good! There is on tap! Good! Like inside! The worst of us is good!
addressing the police officer Krupke, who is Not there, but Oleg's addressed the police officer.
Such a good story. Let me tell it to the world. Let us tell her to the judge.
So one of them adopts the position of a judge.
Dear, kindly judge your honor, My parents treat me rough, With all their marijuana. They won't give me a puff.
Then the psychological explanation.
He shouldn't be here. This boy don't need a couch. He needs a useful career. Society's played him a terrible trick. Unsociologically he's sick. I am We are
We are sick.
The paradox here is how can you know all this and still do it? This is the cynical functioning of ideology. They are never what they appear to be cynical, brutal, delinquents. They always have a tiny private dream. This dream can be many things. It can even be something quite ordinary. Let's take the English riots of August 2011. The standard liberal explanation really sounds like a repetition of Officer Krabke's song. We cannot just condemn these riots as delinquent vandalism. You have to see how these people live in practically ghettos, isolated communities, no proper family life, no proper education. They don't even have a prospect of a regular employment. But this is not enough. Because man is not simply a product of objective circumstances.
It's deep, it's black, it's deep.
We all have this margin of freedom. in deciding how we subjectivize these objective circumstances which of course determine us. How we react to them by constructing our own universe. The conservative solution is we need more police, we need courts which pass severe judgments. I think this solution is too simple. If one listened closely to some of David Cameron's statements it looked as if okay they are beating people burning houses but the truly horrible thing is that they were taking objects without paying for them, the ultimate sin that we can imagine. in a very limited way. Cameron was right. There was no ideological justification. It is the reaction of people who are totally caught into the predominant ideology but have no ways to realize what this ideology demands of them. So it's a kind of a wild thing. Acting out. within this ideological space of consumerism. Even if we are dealing with apparently totally non-ideological brutality, I just want to burn houses to get objects. It is the result of a very specific social and ideological constellation. where big ideology, striving for justice, equality, etc., disintegrates. The only functioning ideology is pure consumerism and then no wonder what you get is a form of protest. Every violent acting out is a sign. that there is something you are not able to put into works. Even the most brutal violence is the enacting of a certain Symbolic. Deadlock The great thing about The taxi driver. Is that it? brings this brutal outburst of violence to its radical suicidal dimension. We are not dealing here with something which simply concerns the fragile Psychology. Over… distorted person what Travis in Taxi Driver is, it has something to do with ideology.
Listen, you fuckers, you screwheads, here is a man who would not take it anymore, who would not Let Listen, you fuckers! Use screw heads. He is a man. who would not take it any more. A man who stood up against the scum, the cunts, the dogs, the filth, the shit. Here is someone who stood up In the 10th.
Taxi driver Travis, the hero, is bothered by the young prostitute played by Jodie Foster. What bothers him are, of course, as is always the case, precisely his fantasies, fantasies of her victimhood, of her hidden pleasures. And fantasies are not just a private matter of individuals. Fantasies are the central stuff our ideologies are made of. Fantasy is, in psychoanalytic perspective, fundamentally a lie. not a lie in the sense that it's just a fantasy but not a reality but a lie in the sense that fantasy covers up a certain gap inconsistency. When things are blurred, when we cannot really get to know things, Fantasy provides an easy answer. The usual mode of fantasy is to construct a scene, not a scene where I get what I desire, but a scene in which I imagine myself as desired by others. A taxi driver is an unacknowledged Remake of perhaps the greatest of John Ford's Westerns, his late Classic. The searchers. I take many Scalps. セレターノスデイ In both films, the hero tries to save a young woman who is perceived as a victim of brutal abuse. In The searchers. The young Natalie Wood was kidnapped and lived for a couple of years as the wife of an Indian chief. In "Taxi Driver" the young Jodie Foster is controlled by a ruthless pimp
You walk out with those fucking creeps and lowlives and degenerates out on the street and you sell your little pussy for nothing, man. For some low-life pimp. stands in a hall, I'm square. You're the one that's square, man. I don't go screwing fuck with a bunch of killers and junkies the way you do.
The task is always to save the perceived Viktor von But what really drives this violence of the hero is a deep suspicion that the victim is not simply a victim, that the victim, effectively in a perverted way, enjoys or participates in what appears as her victimhood, so that, to put it very simply, she doesn't want to be redeemed. She resists it.
Let's go home, Debbie.
And this is the big problem, if I make an immediate jump to the political dimension, the big problem of American military interventions, especially so-called humanitarian interventions. From Iraq to already Vietnam. Eh? Half a century ago We try to help Then But what if they really did not want our help? The result of this debilitating deadlock can only be an outburst of violence. We do get towards the end of the film. Trev is exploding. In a killing spree. killing the pimps, all the people around the young girl. Violence is never just abstract. Violence. It's a kind of brutal intervention in the real to cover up a certain impotence concerning What we may call cognitive mapping. You lack a clear picture of what's going on. Where are we? Exactly the same holds for the terrifying outburst of violence.
I don't care.
Anders Behring Breivik's murderous spree in Oslo, exploding a bomb in front of the government building and then killing dozens of young members of the Social Democratic Party in an island close to Oslo.
Onkoma na onkoma efla eya.
Many commentators tried to dismiss this as a clear case of personal insanity. But I think Breivik's manifesto is well worth reading. It is. palmably clear there. How! This violence that brave it not only theorized about, but also enacted, is a. Reaction to the impenetrability and confusion of global capital. It's exactly like Travis Bickles. Eh? Killing spree at the end of the taxi. Driver. When he is there barely alive, he symbolically with his fingers points a gun at his own head, clear sign that all this violence was basically suicidal. He was on the right path in a way, Travis in the taxi driver. You should have the outburst of violence, and you should direct it at yourself. but in a very specific way. At what in yourself Change you ties you to the ruling ideology.
Pipit pipit Pipit
In Stephen Pielberg's. Joss. A SHARK! starts to attack. people on the beach. What does this attack Mean. What does the shark stand to 4. There were Different, even mutually exclusive answers to this question. On the one hand, some critics claim that obviously the shark stands for the foreign threat to ordinary Americans. The shark is a metaphor for either natural disaster, storms, or immigrants threatening United States citizens and so on. On the other hand, It's interesting to note that Fidel Castro, who loves the film, once said that for him it was obvious that Joss is kind of a leftist Marxist film and that the shark is a metaphor for Brute! Bic. Capital exploiting Ordinary. Americans. So, "quickly" is the right answer. I claim None of them and at the same time all of them. Ordinary Americans, as ordinary people in all countries, have a multitude of fears. We fear all kind of things. We fear Maybe immigrants or people whom we perceive as lower than ourselves attacking us, robbing us. We fear people raping our children. We fear natural disasters, tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunamis. We fear corrupted politicians, we fear big companies which can basically do with us whatever they want. The function of the shark. is to unite all these fears. so that we can in a way trade all these fears for one fear alone. In this way our experience of reality gets much simpler. Why am I mentioning this? Because isn't it that For example, The most extreme case of ideology may be in the history of humanity. the Nazi fascist anti-Semitism. work precisely in the same way. Imagine an ordinary German citizen in the late 20s, early 30s, his situation is, in an abstract way, the same as that of a small child. He's totally perplexed. Social authority, symbolic order, is telling him you are a German worker, banker, whatever, but nothing functions. What does society want from him? Why is everything going wrong? The way he perceives the situation is that newspapers lied to him. He lost his work because of inflation. He lost all his All his money in the bank, his moral degradation and so on. So what's the meaning of this all? The original fascist Dream is To, of course, as a dream of every ideology, to have a cake and to eat it. As it was often pointed out, fascism is, at its most elementary, a conservative revolution. revolution, economic development, modern industry, yes, but a revolution which would nonetheless maintain or even reassert a traditional hierarchical society. a society which is modern, efficient, but at the same time controlled by hierarchic values, with no class or other antagonisms. No. They have a problem here. the fascists. But Antagonism. class struggle and other tensions. is something inherent to capitalism. Modernization, industrialization, as we know from the history of capitalism, means disintegration of old, stable relations. It means social conflicts. Instability is The way capitalism Functions. So how to solve this problem? You need to generate an ideological Narrative which explains how things went wrong in a society not as the result of the inherent tensions in the development of this society, but as the result of a foreign intruder. Things were okay till Jews penetrated our social body. The way to restore the health of our social body is to eliminate The Jews. It's the same operation as with the shark in Jaws. You have a multitude of fears, and this multiplicity of fears confuses you like. You simply don't know what's the meaning of all this confusion. And you replace this confused multitude with one clear figure. The Jew, and everything becomes clear.
year The search for cuts in the social security provision to lone parent families in part spurred this report. The Social Security Department fears that the accelerating budget for single mothers on benefits could reach nearly £5 billion by the end of the decade. But the issue of the lone parent has increasingly been seen as the heart of John Major's back-to-basics crusade. Remember, I think around
Two, three decades ago when the Prime Minister of United Kingdom was John Major. There was a kind of ideological campaign to return to morality and so on. All the evils of society Where? embodied in the conservative narrative in the figure of Uh unemployed single mother like there is violence in our suburbs of course because single unemployed mothers cannot take care of their of their children don't properly educate them and so on. We have. lack in our budget, not enough money, of course, because we have to support unwed single mothers and so on and so on. in an ideological edifice. You need some pseudo-concrete image like this to fixate your imagination and then this image can mobilize us. Imagine ideology as a kind of a Filter. A frame. So that if you look at the same ordinary reality through that frame. Everything changes. In what sense? It's not that the frame Actually, adds anything. It's just that the frame opens the abyss of suspicion.
Thank you. Freilich wandeln sie ihr Äußeres, wenn sie von der polnischen Niststätte in die reiche Welt hinausgelangen.
If we look at the anti-Semitic image of the Jew, it's crucial to notice how contradictory this figure of the Jew is.
Der Relativitätsjude Einstein! der seinen deutschen Hass hinter einer obskuren Pseudowissenschaft versteckte. Der Jude Kestenberg. betreute im preußischen Kultusministerium die deutsche Musik.
Jews are at the same time extra intellectual, like mathematicians, whatever. And vulgar.
Auf Deutsch gesagt. Die jüdischen Behausungen sind unsauber und verwahrlost.
not washing regularly
Der Jüdische Schädel wurde bei seinem Besuch in Berlin von einer begeisterten Menge begrüßt.
seducing innocent girls all the time and so on and so on.
Es lässt sich nicht leugnen, ein Teil des deutschen Volkes applaudierte damals ahnungslos den zugewanderten Juden. den Todfreunden seiner Rasse Wie war das möglich? Natürlich wissen sich diese Ghetto Juden zunächst noch nicht richtig in den sauberen europäischen Anzügen zu bewegen. Etwas besser können es diese Berliner Juden. Ihr Väter und Großväter Haben zwar auch noch im Ghetto gelebt Aber davon merkt man nun äußerlich nichts mehr. Hier in der zweiten und dritten Generation. Hat die Assimilation ihren Höhepunkt erreicht. In allen Äußerlichkeiten versuchen sie, es dem Gastvolk gleichzutun. Wann ist ein Stinkflöhe auf der Percha? Lassen sie sich von dieser Mimikry täuschen! und betrachten sie tatsächlich als ihresgleichen. Darin liegt die ungeheure Gefahr. Denn auch diese assimilierten Juden Bremmkörper im Organismus ihres Gastvolkes. so sehr sie ihn äußerlich ähnlich sehen mögen.
This is typical for racism. You try to imagine how the other enjoys all the secret orgies or whatever, because in racism the other is not simply an enemy. Usually it is also invested with some specific perverse enjoyment or in an inverted way, the other can be someone who tries to steal from us our enjoyments, our to disturb, as we usually put it. our way of life. We should be here. very precise. not to fall into the usual trap of disqualifying all elements out of which the Nazi ideological edifice is composed. to disqualify all them as proto-fascists. We should never forget that the large majority of these elements which we today associate We Fascism were taken from The workers moved.
I… I don't know, it's better.
This idea of large Numbers of people marching together. This idea of Street Bodily. Discipline is our due to… The Nazis directly took this over from social democracy. from the left. Let me just take some other central concepts of the Nazi worldview. The solidarity of the people. My God, there is nothing bad in this notion as such. The problem is solidarity to what kind of people? If by people you mean. Volksgemeinschaft, the organic community of people. Where then? The enemy is automatically. The foreign intruder. In this case we are in Nazism. The crucial thing is to locate ideology where it belongs. Let's take a clear example. The well-known song "Tomorrow belongs to me" from the film "Cabaret".
I'm sorry. Evon. Uh, thanks for the question.
Some of my friends After seeing the film, Bob Fossis, cabaret, thought that after they heard this song, they finally understood what, at its deepest, as to its emotional impact, what fascism is. But I think this precisely is the mistake to be avoided. This song is a rather ordinary popular song incidentally it was composed while they were shooting the movie by a Jewish couple. Nice irony. If you look not only at the music, at the way it is sung, but even at the words, Awakening of a nation tomorrow belongs to me. One can well imagine with a slight change of words, radically leftist, communist song.
What soon sets off Thank you.
The German hard rock band Rammstein. are often accused of flirting, playing with the Nazi militaristic iconography. But if one observes closely their show, one can see very nicely what they are doing. Exemplarily in one of their best known songs, "Rise, Rise". The minimal elements. of the Nazi ideology. enacted by Ramstein are something like pure elements of libidinal investment. Enjoyment has to be, as it were, condensed in some minimal ticks, gestures, which do not have any precise ideological meaning.
I'm sorry.
What Ramstein does. is it liberates this element from their Nazi articulations. It allows us to enjoy them in their pre-ideological state. The way to fight Nazism is to enjoy these elements. ridiculous as they may appear. By suspending the Nazi horizon of meaning. This way. You undermine Nazism from within. So how does nonetheless ideology do this? How That's it. articulate. pre-ideological elements. These elements can also be seen as a kind of a バイ the way ideology tells us to seduce us into its These bribes can be purely libidinal bribes, although sticks which are condensed enjoyment, or they can be explicit discursive elements, like notions of solidarity, Uh, uh, uh. of collective discipline struggle. for one's destiny, and so on and so on. All this in itself are free floating elements which open themselves to Different ideological fields. Let's turn to the high point of our Consumerism. Let me They… A day. Steam. Some of it Starbucks coffee I'm regularly. Drinking it. I must. Admit it. But are we aware of Death. When we buy a cappuccino from Starbucks, we also buy quite a lot of ideology. Which ideology? You know, when you enter a Starbucks store, It's usually always displaced in some posters their message which is yes our cappuccino is more expensive than others but And then comes the story. We give 1% of all our income to some Guatemala children to keep them healthy, for the water supply, for some Sahara farmers, or to save the forests to enable organic growing on coffee, whatever, whatever. Now, I admire the ingenuity of this solution. In the old days, of pure simple consumerism. You bought a product and then you felt bad. My God, I'm just a consumerist while people are starving in Africa. So the idea was you had to do something to counteract your pure destructive consumerism. For example, I don't know, you contribute to charity and so on. What Starbucks enables you is to Be a consumerist. And be a consumerist without any bad conscience because the price for the countermeasure for fighting consumerism is already included into the price of a commodity like you pay a little bit more and you are not just a consumerist but you do also your duty to work environment, the poor starving people in Africa and so on and so on. It's, I think, the ultimate form of consumerism. We should not simply oppose. A principled life dedicated to Duty and enjoying Our Small pleasures. Let's take today's Capitalism. We have… On the one hand. the demands of the circulation of the capital which push us towards profit-making expansion. exploitation and destruction of nature and On the other hand, ecological Dimanche. Let's think about our posterity and about our own survival. Let's take care of nature. And so on. In this opposition between ruthless pursuit of Capitalist expansion, &c. Ecological awareness. Duty, a strange, perverted duty, of course. Duty. is on the side of Capitalism. as many perspicuous analysts. Note it. Capitalism has a strange religious structure. It is. Propelled by this absolute demand. Capital has to circulate, to reproduce itself, to expand, to multiply itself, and for this goal anything can be sacrificed, up to our lives, up to nature, and so on. Here we have a strange, unconditional injunction, and a true capitalist is a miser who is ready to sacrifice everything for this perverted duty. What we see here in Mojave Desert at this Resting place for abandoned planes is the other side of capitalist dynamics. Capitalism is all the time in crisis. This is precisely why it appears almost indestructible. Crisis is not its obstacle, it is what pushes it forwards to Permanent self-revolutionizing, permanent extended self-reproduction. Always new products. The other invisible side of it is waste. tremendous amount of waste. We shouldn't react. to these heaps of waste by trying to somehow get rid of it. Maybe. The first thing to do is to accept this waste, to accept that there are things out there which serve Nothing. to break out of this eternal cycle of functioning. The German philosopher Walter Benjamin said something very deep. He said that We experience history. What does it mean for us to be historical beings? Not when we are engaged in things, when things move. Only when we see. This, again, rest, waste of culture, being half retaken by nature. At that point we get an intuition of what history means. Maybe this also accounts for the redemptive value of post-catastrophic movies. like I am legend and so on. We see the Devastated. Human environment. Half empty factories. Machines falling apart. Half empty stores. What we experience at this moment The psychoanalytic term for it would have been the inertia of the real, this mute presence beyond meaning. What moments like confronting plains here in Mojave Desert bring to us is maybe a chance for an authentic passive experience. Maybe without this properly artistic moment of authentic passivity nothing new can emerge. Maybe something new only emerges through the failure The suspension of proper functioning of the existing network of our life work. where we are. Maybe this is what we need. more than ever today. What does the wreck of the Titanic stand for? We all know the standard reading. of the impact of the sinking of the Titanic. Not only. the film but the real accident. This thinking had such an impact because it happened in a society at that point still in all its glitz and glory. unaware of the decay that awaited it in the near future. the world wars and so on. But there is something in excess of this entire field of meanings, which is the very fascinating presence of the ruin of the Titanic at the bottom of the ocean. when James Cameron organized A trip to the real wreck of Titanic. He also made a similar remark. When the explorers approached the wreck. They had this almost metaphysical experience that they are approaching a forbidden territory in which the sacred and the obscene overlap.
Yeah, Roger that. Okay, drop down and go into the first class gangway door. I want you guys working the D deck.
every effective political ideological symbol or symptom. has to rely on this dimension of petrified enjoyment. of the frozen grimace of an excessive Pleasure in pain. What am I doing here? In the middle of the ocean. alone in a boat. surrounded by frozen corpses. I'm in a scene from James Cameron's Titanic. which is The supreme case of ideology in recent Hollywood. Why? because of the imminent tension. to the story of the film.
On the steps. Just go with it.
have at least three levels. First, there is what people ironically refer to as James Cameron's Hollywood Marxism. This Ridiculous. Sake. Sympathy with lower classes. Up there, first-class passengers, they are mostly all evil, egotistic. You know I don't like that role. embodied in Kate Winslet's fiancee, played by Billy Zane.
Okay.
This whole narrative is sustained by a much more reactionary myth.
He said, "I'm sorry." Those guys' faces.
We should ask what role does the iceberg hitting the ship play in the development of the love story.
The ship docks. I'm getting off with you.
This is crazy.
I know.
My claim is here a slightly cynical one. This would have been the true catastrophe. We can. Imagine how! Maybe after two, three weeks of Intense sex in New York. The love affair would somehow fade away.
As a paying customer. I expect to get what I want.
Kate Winslet is An upper class. Girl! In… psychological. distressed. confused. Her ego is in shatters. And the function of Leonardo DiCaprio. The bed. The catch. is simply that. He helps her too. Ree constitute her ego. Lie down. Her self-image Literally, he dross, corny.
Tell me when it looks right. Put your arm back the way it was.
was It's really a new version of one of the old favored imperialist myths. The idea being that when the upper class people lose their vitality. They need a contact with lower classes. Basically ruthlessly. exploiting them in a vampire-like way. As it were, sucking from them the life energy. revitalize they can join their secluded Upper class life.
My heart was pounding the whole time. It was the most erotic moment of my life.
up until The cheapest. hits the iceberg. not immediately after. Six. Win. The couple goes up to the open space and decide to stay together. Eh, look at this! You know often in history. The event which may appear as a catastrophe. Saves persons or an idea, elevating it into a myth. Remember the intervention of the Soviet army and other Warsaw Pact armies in 1968 in Czechoslovakia. to strangle the so-called Prague Spring. the attempt of the Czech Democratic Communists to introduce a more human-faced socialism. Usually we perceive this brutal Soviet intervention as something that destroyed. The brief dream of Prague Spring. I think it saved the dream. Either Czechoslovakia would have turned into an ordinary liberal capitalist state or at a certain point, which was usually the fate of reformist communists, the communists in power would be obliged to set a certain limit. Okay, you had your fun, your freedom, That's enough now we again Defin. The limits. Again. The paradox is that precisely the Soviet intervention saved the dream of the possibility of another communism and so on and so on. So here again. through the temporal catastrophe We have a love story which if, as it were, redeemed in its idea, saved for eternity. We can ultimately read the catastrophe as a desperate maneuver to save the illusion of eternal love. We can see how ideology works effectively here. We have two superficial levels. all the fascination of the accidental Then the last story, but all this, which is quite acceptable for our liberal progressive minds, all this is just a threat Something to Lower our attention. Threshold, as it were. to open us Up! to be ready to accept The true conservative. Message of Rich people having the right to revitalize themselves by ruthlessly appropriating The vitality of the poor people.
There's nothing else, sir.
There is a wonderful detail which tells everything. When Kate Winslet notices that Leonardo DiCaprio is dead She, of course, starts to shout, "I will never let go! I will never let go! Why, at the same moment, "Never let go! She pushes him off. He is what we may call, ironically, A vanishing mediator. This logic of the production of a couple. has a long History Hollywood. Whatever the story is about it may be about the end of the world an asteroid threatening the very survival of humanity or a great war, whatever. As a rule, We always have a couple who's Link is threatened and who, somehow, Through this ordeal, At the end, uh… Happily. Gets together. This logic does not hold only for Hollywood films. Come on.
Erzähle mit dem Himmler. What a great start!
In the late 40s. In Soviet Union They produced arguably one of the most expensive films of all times, "The Fall of Berlin". The Chronicle of the Second World War. 1. From the Soviet standpoint. And it's incredible how closely this film also follows the logic of the production of a couple. The story begins just before the German attack on Soviet Union when a model worker who is in love with a local girl that is too shy. to propose to her, is called to Moscow. to get a medal from Comrade Stalin. There Stalin notices his Confusion, distress, and Stalin gives him some advice, which poetry to quote, and so on. This part unfortunately was lost. Because in the background of this scene there was Beria, a Soviet politician who after Stalin's death became a non-person. was shot as a traitor. But we know from the screenplay what was there. If Stalin gives you a love advice it has to succeed so the couple embraces.
Masha! Thank you.
He carries her probably to make love. At that very moment there is the triumphant, violent entrance of the obstacle. German plays come. dropping bombs.
Natalia! Natação, Gargantas Me too.
The girl is taken prisoner.
It's your rabbit. A muechtok, kriyak, yiraski, kajay.
The boy, of course, joins the Red Army and we follow him through all the great battles. The idea being that in a deeper Logic of the film, what these battles were about. was really to recreate The couple. The boy has to get his girl. This is what happens at the end. But in a very strange way which re-confirms Stalin's role as the supreme divine matchmaker. The scene itself, Stalin immersing himself into a crowd of ordinary people, never happened. Stalin was totally paranoid about flying about taking planes. But nonetheless. When he saw this scene he cried.
ただし Sevokada We praise thee in Elipu y Pagadu. Adgerman's skin fascism.
Of course, he himself, as we know, wrote. The lines. When the couple encounters each other The girl first kissed Stalin. Then she turns around and, surprised, sees her lover for whom she was waiting all the time of the war. So it's only through the presence of Stalin that the couple gets reunited.
Are you sure? I know I know I know Natacha!
This is how ideology works. Not the explicit ideology of the film, which we hear at the end, Stalin saying, now all the free people will enjoy peace and so on and so on. But precisely ideology at its more fundamental. This apparently totally subordinated motive. and important in itself. The story of a couple This is what いいし The key element which holds the entire film. together that small surplus element which attracts us, which maintains our attention. This is how ideology works.
Nice. Everything clean. All right. so that your action is beautiful.
It's really shiny. We usually think that military discipline is just a matter of mindlessly following orders, obeying the rules. You don't think you do what is your duty. It's not as simple as that. If we do this we just become machines. There has to be something more. This mark can have two basic forms. The first, more benign form is an ironic distance. Best epitomized by the well-known movie and TV series, "Mash". where the military doctors are involved in sexual escapades.
Same.
make jokes all the time. Some people took Robert Altman's movie "Mash" even as a kind of an anti-militaristic satiric product. But it's not. We should always bear in mind that these soldiers, with all their practical jokes, making fun of their superiors and so on, operated perfectly as soldiers. They did their Duty. Time for this one's for you, babe. much more ominous is a kind of Opinion Supplement to Pure military discipline. In practically all movies about the U.S. Marines, the best known embodiment of this obscenity are marching troops. A mixture of nonsense. and obscenity. I don't know This is not undermining, making fun of military discipline. it is its innermost constituent. You take this Opshin. Supplement. Away, and military Machine stops Working.
Well, No shit. What have we got here? A fucking comedian! Private Joker! I admire your honesty. Hell, I like you. You can come over to my house and fuck my sister. Oh! You little scumbag! I got your name. I got your ass. You will not laugh, you will not cry, you will learn by the numbers. I will teach you. Now get up, get on your feet. You at best unfuck yourself, or I will unscrew your head and shake down your neck. Sir, yes, sir. Private Joker, why did you join my beloved corps? I think
that The drill sergeant. the way it is. Plate. In an exemplary way in Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. The drill sergeant. is rather a tragic figure. I always like to imagine him as a person who, after his work, returns home, is quite decent, and so on.
I'm going to
All his obscene shouting is just a show put on not so much to impress ordinary soldiers whom he is training as to bribe them with Witch of Enchantment. It's not just a question of this obscenities which sustains the military machinery, it's another more general rule which holds for military communities, but Even more, I would say, for all. human communities, from the largest nations, ethnic groups, up to small university departments and so on. You don't only have explicit rules You always in order to become part of a community you need some implicit, unwritten rules. which are never publicly recognized but are absolutely crucial as the point of the identification of a group. In the UK. Everyone knows about the obscene unwritten rituals which regulate life in Public schools
Thank you, Fincher. I want to see your wits in my study after break, Bryson. Oh, how is India? Enjoy it? Jolly good, which is
Just think about Lindsay Anderson's classic if. The public life is democratic. We have professors who interact with their pupils, nice atmosphere, teaching, friendship, spirit of cooperation. But then we all know what happens. beneath the surface. older pupils torturing sexually abusing the younger, this same mixture of obscenity and sadistic violence. And again, what is crucial here is we should not simply put all the blame or all the enjoyment on the older cupcakes.
It's like no no no no
The victims even are part of this infernal cycle of obscenity. It is as if in order to really be a member of a community you have to render your hands dirty. And I think that even The Abu Ghraib scandal of American soldiers torturing and especially humiliating Iraqi prisoners is to be read in this way. It's not simply We, the arrogant Americans, are humiliating others. What Iraqi soldiers experienced there was the staging of the obscene underside of the American military culture. In full metal jacket. It's the character of Joker. Played by Matthew Modine. who is close to what we would call a normal soldier, a mess type of soldier. He has a proper ironic distance. He proves at the end militarily the most efficient soldier. Returning back to me. Why, then, will I soon shoot myself? Something went wrong there, but what? Rock and roll. I did not just run amok. Order! Hear!
This is my rifle. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
but I got too directly identified with these obscene rituals, I lost the distance, I took them seriously.
Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus,
Es ist You get too close to it, if you over identify with it, if you really immediately become the voice of this super ego, it's self destructive. You kill people around you. You end up Killing yourself.
シュシュシュシュシュシュ So you think Batman's made Gotham a better place. Huh? Thank you. Look at me. What does that mean? You see, this is how crazy Batman's made Gotham. If you want order in Gotham, Batman must take off his mask and turn himself in. Every day he doesn't, people will die. starting tonight. I'm a man of my word. So who is she? Joker.
which is the lie he is opposing. I'm gonna need
I need a cup of coffee. The good cop, bad cop routine.
Not exactly. The truly disturbing thing about The dark Night. Is that it elevates Lye. into a general social principle into the principle of organization of our social political life as if Our societies can remain stable. can function only if based on a lie, as if telling the truth and this telling the truth is embodied in Joker. means destruction. disintegration of the social order.
Never start with the head. The victim gets all buzzed. You can't feel the next.
Towards the end it is as if light functions as a hot potato. Passing from one person's hand to another person's hand. First there is Harvey Dent. Thank you. Take the batman in. The public prosecutor who lies claiming that he is the real person behind Batman's mask that he is Batman. Then we have Gord. Honest policeman, Batman's friend, who? Fakes states his own Death!
I'll see you later. Thank you.
Five dead. Two of them cops. You can't sweep them.
At the end, Batman himself. takes upon himself The crimes, murders committed by Harvey Dent. The public prosecutor turned criminal. God! It's true. in order to Maintain The trust of the public into the legal system. The idea is if the ordinary public were to learn how corrupted was or is the very core of our legal system then everything would have collapsed so we need a lie to maintain order.
I hear it. Not a hero. We deserved to be the hero we needed. Nothing less than a knight. Chine
There is nothing new in this. This is an old conservative Wisdom. asserted long ago by philosophers from Plato, but especially, and then Immanuel Kant, Edmund Burke, and so on and so on, this idea that The truth is too strong that a politician should be a cynicist who although he knows what is true tells to ordinary people what Plato called a noble fable a lie.
Um… The United States knows. that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. The UK knows. That's great. They have weapons of mass destruction. any country on the face of the earth with an active intelligence program. knows that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population.
The choice is his. And if he does not disarm, the United States of America will lead a coalition and disarm him in the name of peace.
Different. We can have a state public system of power. as legitimate as you want submitted to critical press, democratic elections and so on and so on, apparently it just served. serves us. Duck Nonetheless, if you look closely into how even the most democratic State power functions. In order for it to display through authority and power niche authority. There has to be, as it were, between the lines. All the time this message of yeah, yeah, yeah, we are legalized through elections, but basically we can do with you whatever we want.
Because that's what needs to happen. Because sometimes The truth isn't good enough. Sometimes people deserve more. Sometimes people deserve have their faith.
One of the great Platitudes. which are popular today. When we are. confronted with Aktschov. Violence. Is to refer to Fyodor Dostoevsky's Famous statement from Brother Skaramazov. If there is No, God! then Everything is Permitted. Well, The first problem with this statement is that Dostoievsky, of course, never made it. The first one who used this phrase is allegedly made by Dostoevsky was Jean-Paul Sartre in 1933. But... The main point is that this Statement is simply wrong. Even a brief look at our predicament today clearly tells us this.
Kaukabatani Muntawak, Muntawak, Abi Nasrul.
Precisely. If there is God. that everything is permitted to those who not only believe in God, but who perceive themselves as instruments, direct instruments of the divine will. If you posit or perceive or legitimize yourself as a direct instrument of the Divine Will, Then, of course, all. Narrow petty Moral considerations. disappear. How can you even think in such narrow terms when you are a director. instruments of God. This is how so-called religious fundamentalists work, but not only them. Every form of so-called Totalitarianism works like death. Even if it is presented or if it presents itself as atheist, let's take Stalinism, officially. Stalinism was based on atheist Marxist theories. If we look closely at this. subjective experience of a Stalinist political agent. Leader We see that it's not a position of an arrogant master who can do whatever he wants, it's on the contrary the position of a perfect servant. In the Stalinist universe there definitely is what in psychoanalytic theory we call the big other.
España. See you in a couple. I should be in the club more. Stop! Thank you. Oh my god All the girls. バイバイ Thank you.
This big Other in the Stalinist universe has many names. The best known of them are the necessity of historical progress towards communism or simply History History itself is the big other. History is. the necessary succession of historical stages. A communist experiences himself as simply an instrument whose function is to actualize a historical necessity. The people, mythic people. whose instrument the totalitarian leader is. are never simply the actually existing individuals, groups of people, and so on. It's some kind of imagined, idealized. point of reference which works even when For example, in Rebellions against the communist rule. Like in Hungary 56. When? The large majority of Actually resisting people raises up is opposed to the regime. They can still say no, these are just individuals, they are not The true people. When you are accused of, my God, how could you have been doing all these horrible things? You could have said, and this is the standard Stalinist excuse, "Of course my heart bleeds for all the poor victims." I am not fully responsible for it. I was only acting on behalf of the big other.
Stabilize.
Oh, _skazon! As for myself, I like cats, small children, whatever. This is always part of the iconography of a Stalinist leader. Lenin in Stalinism is always presented as someone who likes small children and cats, the implication being Lenin had to order many killings and so on, but his heart was not there. This was his duty as instrument of historical progress and so on and so on. The way to undermine Stalinism is not simply to make fun of the leader, which can be up to a point even tolerated. It is to undermine This very reference, mythic reference, which legitimizes the Stalinist leader, the people. This is how. I read The by far Best work of Miloš Forman, his early Czech films. Black Peter, the Loves of a Blonde, and Fireman's Ball. where he mocks precisely the ordinary people. in their daily conformism, stupidity, egotistic lust, and so on and so on.
Hello. では。 Troschkuški muta to. Mikesen, oh, Herr Gott! Auch die Bürgerinnen und Bürger sind in der Lage, sich gegen die Verfolgung zu wehren.
It may appear that this is something very arrogant, but no, I think that this is the way to undermine the entire structure of the Stalinist universe, to demonstrate not that leaders are not leaders, they are always ready to say, oh, but we're just ordinary people like you, know that. There is no mythic people which serves as the ultimate legitimization.
おめでとうございます。
So what is the big other? This basic element of every ideological edifice. It has two… quite contradictory aspects. On the one hand, of course, the big other is the secret order of things, like divine reason, fate, or whatever, which is controlling our destiny. But this is maybe the least interesting aspect of the big other. as the agency which guarantees the meaning of what we are doing. Much more interesting is the big Other is the order of Appearances.
Yeah.
Many things which are prohibited. are not simply prohibited, but They should not happen for the big other. A supreme example of this. Agency of the Big Other as the agency of Appearance is the prattling busybody in David Lean's masterpiece Brief Encounter. At the very beginning of the film. The two lovers, Celia Johnson and Trevor Howard, arranged for their last meeting in a cafeteria of a small train station.
Lora, what happened? Lovely surprise!" "Oh, Dr. " "My dear, I've been shopping till I'm dropping. My feet are nearly off, my throat's parched. I thought of having tea at Spindles', but I was terrified of losing the train. Oh, dear! This is Dr. Harvey. Would you be a perfect dear and get me my cup of tea? I really don't think I could drag my poor old bones over the counter.
Why is this situation so interesting? Because on the one hand, We cannot but experience this annoying lady as a brutal intruder.
There's your train.
I know.
Oh, aren't you coming with us?
I go in the opposite direction. My practice is in Shirley.
Oh, I see.
I'm a general practitioner at the moment.
Dr. Harvey's going out to Africa next week. Oh, that's really it.
Instead of the two lovers being allowed at least their final moments alone they have to maintain the appearances that nothing is happening between them that they are just acquaintances and so on and so on.
He'll have to run or he'll miss it. He's got to get right over to the other platform.
This precisely is the function of the big other. We need for our stability a figure of big other for whom we maintain appearances.
And I arrived at the station with exactly half a minute to spare. My dear, I flew!
But are things really as simple as that? The next scene, the scene of Celia Johnson, totally desperate, she knows that she will never again see her lover.
Yes, he's a nice creature. Have you known him long? No, not very long. I hardly know 'em at all, really." "Well, my dear, I've always had a passion for doctors.
Then we hear the line of Celia Johnson's thought.
Okay.
Trust
I wish you were a wise, kind friend. instead of a gossiping acquaintance I've known casually for years and never particularly cared for.
What is the nature of this deadlock of Celia Johnson? She is split. between the two figures in the film of the Big Other. On the one hand, it's her husband. The ideal Listener But It's out of question to confess to him.
Okay. Are you afraid? There's so much that I want to say to you. You're the only one in the world with enough wisdom and gentleness to understand. Wild horses wouldn't drag me away from England and home and all the things I'm used to. I mean, one has one's roots after all, hasn't one? Yes, one has one's roots.
On the other hand, you have here this stupid person who is available as a confessor, but there is not even an elementary trust.
I wish you'd stop talking. That we should stop prying and trying to find things out. I wish you were dead. No, I don't mean that. that was silly and unkind. I wish you'd stop talking." "My dear, all her hair came out, and she said the social life was quite, quite horrid, provincial, you know, and very nouveau riche." "Oh, darling, what's the matter, dear? Are you feeling ill again?"
So that's the tragedy of our predicament. In order to fully exist as individuals, we need the fiction of a big other. There must be an agency which, as it were, registers our predicament, an agency, where the truth of ourselves will be inscribed. Accept it. An agency to which to confess. But what if There is no such agency. This was The utmost despair of many women raped in the post-Yugoslav war in Bosnia in the early 90s. They survived their terrible predicament. And what kept them alive was the idea, "I must survive to tell the truth." If When, if they survived. They made a terrible discovery. There is no one really to listen to them, either some totally ignorant board social worker or some relative. who usually made obscene insinuations like, are you sure you were not even enjoying a little bit the rape and so on and so on. The truth of what? Jacques Lacan claims there is no Big Other. There! may be a virtual big Other. to whom you cannot confess There may be. A. real other but it's never The virtual one.
We are… Hallo.
I think Kafka was right. When he said that. For a modern, secular, non-religious man. Bureaucracy, state bureaucracy, is the only remaining contact with the dimension of the divine. It is in this scene from Brazil that we see the intimate link between bureaucracy and enjoyment. What the impenetrable omnipotence of bureaucracy harbors is divine enjoyment.
The first terrorist is the last of his victims. Mr. Walsh, yes. Mr. Walsh, no. Mr. Walsh, Captain, they know.
Mr. Warren, standby. the intense rush of bureaucratic engagement. Serves nothing.
I'm glad to have you with me. Yes
It is the performance of its very purposelessness. that generates an intense enjoyment ready to reproduce itself forever.
Big things to come, Mr. Finance. Between you and me, Larry, this no-no department, tell records to get stuck. It's about to be upgraded. Here we are. Your video number on your video door. And behind that door your very own office. Congratulations, DZ Stroke 015. Welcome to the team. No, cancel that. Send two copies to Findout.
The obverse of this is a wonderful scene more towards the beginning of the film.
Thank you. "Harry Tuttle, heating engineer, at your service."
The hero who has a problem in his apartment with plumbing tries to get the state agency to fix it.
Are you from central services?
Of course, two guys come. They just want forms to fill in. They do nothing. I call it central services. And then the ultimate subversive figure comes. A kind of clandestine plumber played by Robert De Niro.
Score that business with a gun. This is the precaution, sir. Just to pre-
He who tells him just tell me what is the problem and promises quickly to fix it. This, of course, is the ultimate offense to bureaucracy.
Are you telling me that this is illegal?
Thanks. in China. We're all in it together. In the ordinary theological universe, your duty is imposed onto you by God or society and other higher authority, and your responsibility is to do it. But in a radically atheist universe. You are not only responsible for doing your duty. You are also responsible for deciding what is your duty. There is always in our subjectivity, in the way we experience ourselves, a minimum of Sisteria Hysteria is what. Hysteria is the way we question our social symbolic identity.
You're sure it's God? You're sure it's not the devil?"
I'm not sure.
I'm not sure if anything If it's the devil, the devil can be cast out.
But what if it's gone?
You can't cast out God, can you? What is hysteria at its most elementary? It's a question addressed at the authority which defines my identity. It's why am I what you are telling me that I am? In psychoanalytic theory, hysteria is much more subversive than perversion. A pervert has no uncertainties, while, again, the hysterical position is that of a doubt, which is an extremely productive position. All new inventions come from hysterical questioning. And the unique character of Christianity is that it transposes this hysterical questioning onto God Himself as a subject.
Who's that? Who's following me? Is that you?
This is the ingenious idea of The last temptation of Christ. Ah!
ja
I don't know. Sorry. Kazantzakis' novel and Scorsese's film, namely the idea that when Jesus Christ in his youth He stole. that he is. not only the Son of God, but basically God Himself. He doesn't simply accept it. This is For Jesus Christ, boy, traumatic news like, 'My God, why am I dead? Am I really dead? How did we come to that unique point, which I think makes Christianity an exception? It all began with the Book of Job. As we all know, things turn out bad for Job. He loses everything. His house. his family, his possessions, and so on. Three friends visit him and each of them tries to justify Job's misfortunes. The greatness of Job is that he does not accept this deeper meaning. Bend towards the end of the book of Job. God Himself appears. God gives right to choice. He says, "Everything that the theological friends We're telling you Job is false. Everything Job was saying is true. No meaning in catastrophes. Here we have the first step in the direction of delegitimizing Suffering. Stay with me. Don't leave me.
Oh
The contrast! between Judaism and Christianity is the contrast between anxiety and love. The idea is that The Jewish God. is the god of the abyss of the other's desire. Terrible things happen. God is in charge, but we do not know what the big other God wants from us. What is the divine desire? to designate this traumatic experience. Lacon used the Italian phrase "cavvoi". What do you want? This. Terrifying question, but what do you want from me? The idea is that Judaism persists in this anxiety like God remains this enigmatic, terrifying other. And then Christianity resolved the tension through love. by sacrificing his son. God demonstrates that He loves us. So it's a kind of a imaginary, sentimental, even Resolution of a situation of radical anxiety.
Es ist ein sehr guter Film. She's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got a she's got Don't don't
Ah, oui.
I give.
If this were to be the case, then Christianity would have been kind of ideological reversal or pacification of the deep, much more shattering Jewish insight. But I think one can read the Christian gesture in a much more radical way. This is what the sequence of crucifixion in Scorcese's film shows us. What dies on the cross is precisely this guarantee of the big other. The message of Christianity is here radically atheist. It's the death of Christ is not any kind of redemption or commercial affair in the sense of Christ suffers to pay for our sins, pay to whom, for what and so on. It's simply the disintegration of the God which guarantees the meaning of our lives. and that's the meaning of that famous Frais, Eli, Eli, Lama Shabak Tami. Father, why have you forsaken me?
Forsaken me!
Just before Christ's death. We get what in psychoanalytic terms we call subjective destitution. stepping out totally of the domain of Symbolic. Identification. cancelling or suspending the entire field of symbolic authority the entire field of the big other. Of course we cannot know what God wants from us because there is no God. This is the Jesus Christ, who says, among other things. I bring shirt. not peace. If you don't hate your father, your mother, you are not my follower. Of course, this doesn't mean that you should actively hate or kill your parents. I think that family relations stand here for hierarchic social relations. The message of Christ is. I'm dying, but my death itself is good news. It means you are alone, left to your freedom. be in the Holy Ghost. holy spirit, which is just the community of believers. It's wrong to think that The second coming will be that Christ as a figure will Return, somehow. Christ is already here when Believers form an emancipatory collective. This is why I claim that The only way really to be an atheist is to go through Christianity. Christianity is much more atheist than The usual Atheism. Which? can claim there is no God and so on, but nonetheless it retains a certain trust into the big other. This big other can be called natural necessity, evolution, or whatever. We humans are nonetheless reduced to a. position within a harmonious whole of evolution, whatever. But the difficult thing to accept is again that there is no big other, no point of reference which guarantees meaning. We are in… John Frankenheimer's seconds. A Neglect at Hollywood. masterpiece from 1966 from the very heart of the hippie era. which preached unrestrained hedonism, realized your dreams, enjoy life fully. The film is the story of a late middle-aged businessman leading a gray, totally alienated life, and then he decides at some point that he has enough of it. Through one of his friends, he contacts a mysterious agency which offers him a deal. They will reorganize his life so that he will be Reborn.
The cost runs in the neighborhood of thirty thousand dollars. I know this seems rather high, but in addition to the rather Extensive cosmetic renovation by way of plastic surgery for you. C.P.S. has to provide a fresh corpse that perfectly matches. Your physical dimensions and medical specifications? CPS. Oh, cadaver, procurement section.
They use some corpse, they change it to look like his own body. They planted this corpse stage a pseudo accident so that police thinks he is dead. Mr. Wilson, you represent something of a stone around here. And then, uh, . The agency organizes an alternate life. in a nice villa somewhere around La, they even organize a nice lady who conveniently stumbles upon him when he is taking a walk along the beach. He is thus reborn.
I'm Norma.
no longer as a boring businessman but as a modernist, painter, Tony Wilson, golf. Don't you Wilson. played by none other than Rock Hudson. So the woman Nora, his new love. tries to engage him in life, even takes him to some wine orgy where people get drunk, dance naked, and so on. Everything seems okay. But Tony Wilson Starts to miss his old life. More and more he is haunted by his Pasta Finally, he breaks down. approaches again the agency. telling them that he wants to return to his old life. the boss of this mysterious company, a kind of kindly cruel. "Hello, son! Super ego paternal figure! tells him the truth. He disappointed them by not being able to adapt himself to his new life.
You know, I sure hoped you'd make it. Find your dream come true. I said I sure hoped that you'd make it. Find your dream come true?
You can call it
Peaceful thinking, sir. Life is built on wish. And you've got to just keep plugging away at him. Can't. Give up.
can't let the mistakes So what went wrong here? The problem was that his past in its material existence was erased. "Here's your transportation." Well, surgery, sir. He lived in a totally new environment, new job. new friends and so on. What remained the same were his dreams. Because when the company organized his rebirth When the company provided new Existence. for him. They simply followed his dreams. His dreams were wrong dreams. And this is quite a deep lesson for the theory of ideology. Just remember, son, we gotta keep plugging away at the dream. The mistakes teach us how. It wasn't wasted. Remember that." On the way to the operation hall, he discovers the horrible truth. He will not be reborn but he will be used as a Cadaver for another person. who wants to be reborn. Solveve We should draw a line of distinction within the very field of our dreams. So keep it until life eternal. Between those who are the right dreams. pointing towards a dimension effectively beyond our existing society and the wrong dreams, the dreams which are just an idealized Consumerist. Reflection. Mirror image of our society. We are not simply submitted to our dreams. They just come from some unfathomable depths and we can't do anything about it. This is the basic lesson of psychoanalysis and fiction cinema. We are responsible for our dreams. Our dreams stage our desires and our desires are not objective facts. We created them, we sustain them, we are responsible for them.
This is an area of ancient lakebeds deposited 5 to 10 million years ago.
The scene of mass orgy in Zabriskie Point. is a nice metaphor of what went wrong. with the 1960s hippie revolution. It's crucial that Zabriskie Point was made in 1970. when the authentic revolutionary energy of the 60s was already losing its strength. This orgy is somewhere between subversion of the existing social order And already the full aestheticized reincorporation of these allegedly transgressive activities into the hegemonic ideology. although Antonioni meant this as a kind of transcendence of the existing constraints We can easily imagine this thought. in some publicity campaign. The first step to freedom is not just to change reality to fit your dreams, it's to change the way you dream. And again, this hurts, because all satisfactions we have come from our
Trinche. The great Supreme Commander, Chairman Mao, issued a world-shaking call to us. You should pay attention to state affairs. and carry the great proletarian cultural revolution Move to the end.
One of the big problems of all great revolutionary movements of the 20th century such as Russia, Cuba, or China, is that they did change the social body But the egalitarian communist society was never realized. The dreams remained the old dreams. And they turned into the ultimate nightmare. Now what remains of the Radical Left? Waits for a magical event when the true revolutionary agent will finally awaken. While the depressing lesson of the last decades is that capitalism has been the true revolutionizing force, even as it serves only itself. How come it is easier for us to imagine the end of all life on earth, an asteroid hitting the planet, than a modest change in our economic order? Perhaps the time has come to set our possibilities straight and to become realists by way of demanding what appears as impossible in the economic domain. The surprising explosion of Occupy Wall Street protests. The mass mobilization in Greece. The crowds on Tahrir Square. They all bear witness to the hidden potential for a different future. There is no guarantee that this future will arrive. No train of history on which we simply have to take a ride. It depends on us. on our will. In… REVOLUTIONARY UPHEAVALS. Some energy, or rather some Utopian dreams, take place, they explode, and even if the actual result of a social upheaval is just a commercialized everyday. Life Vich Excess of energy what gets lost in the result. Presents. not in reality, but as a dream. haunting us, waiting to be redeemed. In this sense. Whenever we are engaged in radical emancipatory politics We should never forget. As Walter Benjamin Put it. almost a century ago. That's right. Every revolution is not only If it is an authentic revolution is not only directed towards the future, but it redeems Also the past. Failed. REVOLUTIONS. All the ghosts, as if we're the living dead of the past revolution. which are roaming around unsatisfied. will finally find their home. in the new Freedom.
Bischen, bischen, bischen, bischen. Tengo que ser libre, rudo y fuerte. Oh, my God. Oh. I'm feeling it. Thank you. I'm going to march again. Thank you. No, no, no. Oh, fie on thee! The last and not the only
I may be freezing. to death. But you will never get rid of me. All the eyes in the world cannot kill a true idea.